links for 2007-10-27

Comments

  1. justin wrote:

    Daniel Dae Kim was probably drinking because John Cho is the new Sulu

  2. Kellie wrote:

    “What white feminism looks like” - there was an interesting article in Mother Jones written from the adoptive mother’s perspective that has been all over the transracial/international adoption blogs recently:

    http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/11/did-i-steal-my-daughter.html

  3. hadji wrote:

    Anyone whose ever studied the history of feminism will find three reoccurring themes (1) from its point of origin, an almost maternalistic bordering on self-denial approach to dealing women of color.

    it’s as if women of color are white women’s little sisters at best, their hobbies at worst. and underlying belief is that white women are the “real women” who need to show all women of color(especially black women) what it means to be feminine.

    (2)Feminists write off white racism prejudice as the sole domain of white men, and when confronted with it, white feminists pull out phrases like “white male hegemony” “paternalism”, and other man-based tags to shirk all responsiblity on their end.

    (3) They Inclusion Party. Feminsim at best uses a condescending “lets include” approach to embracing issues of race/women of color. It’s like saying, “hey we’re having a party, and wouldn’t it be nice to invite the dark people–it’s the ‘nice thing to do’”.
    this is the female equivalent of the class White Man’s Burden syndrome.

    One more thing: please go back and study the following: The ERA, the Women’s Suffrage Movement and Eugenics. In the case of the ERA and the Women’s Suffrage Movement black women were left behind by white women, despite having various orgs go to black women and black civil rights orgs for support in their issues.

    Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned parenthood and a pioneer of Eugenics, worked under the belief that abortion should be used to weed out the “genetically unfit” of society—namely minorities of color.

    Feminists seem to never have a problem with the millions of black abortions, tho.

    For these and other reasons, the vast majority of black feminists, black women and black men don’t take feminism seriously. never have, never will. the standard, run-of-the-mill bigot is traditionally much more upfront and honest. and therefore less irritating.

  4. hadji wrote:

    12.

    Anyone whose ever studied the history of feminism will find three reoccurring themes (1) from its point of origin, an almost maternalistic bordering on self-denial approach to dealing women of color.

    it’s as if women of color are white women’s little sisters at best, their hobbies at worst. and underlying belief is that white women are the “real women” who need to show all women of color(especially black women) what it means to be feminine.

    (2)Feminists write off white racism prejudice as the sole domain of white men, and when confronted with it, white feminists pull out phrases like “white male hegemony” “paternalism”, and other man-based tags to shirk all responsiblity on their end.

    (3) They Inclusion Party. Feminsim at best uses a condescending “lets include” approach to embracing issues of race/women of color. It’s like saying, “hey we’re having a party, and wouldn’t it be nice to invite the dark people–it’s the ‘nice thing to do’”.
    this is the female equivalent of the class White Man’s Burden syndrome.

    One more thing: please go back and study the following: The ERA, the Women’s Suffrage Movement and Eugenics. In the case of the ERA and the Women’s Suffrage Movement black women were left behind by white women, despite having various orgs go to black women and black civil rights orgs for support in their issues.

    Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned parenthood and a pioneer of Eugenics, worked under the belief that abortion should be used to weed out the “genetically unfit” of society—namely minorities of color.

    Feminists seem to never have a problem with the millions of black abortions, tho.

    For these and other reasons, the vast majority of black feminists, black women and black men don’t take feminism seriously. never have, never will. the standard, run-of-the-mill bigot is traditionally much more upfront and honest. and therefore less irritating.

  5. Free wrote:

    “The Dove Campaign for Real Beauty is a global effort that is intended to serve as a starting point for societal change and act as a catalyst for widening the definition and discussion of beauty.”

    Dover Campaign for Real Beauty ads in Thailand feature very fair-complexioned (read white) looking Thai women. A Thai friend thought that the models are half-French. All Dove is doing in Thailand is supporting the rampant skin-whitening fetish.

  6. Anonymous wrote:

    Justin:

    “Daniel Dae Kim was probably drinking because John Cho is the new Sulu”

    Sorry, not as funny as you thought it would be.

  7. gatamala wrote:

    Lost has some issues. I saw where they shoot it on the North Shore. It’s tempting.

  8. justin wrote:

    I didn’t intend that as much of a joke. Kim would be a better Sulu than Cho. It would be like poetic justice for him have that role after playing so many less noteworthy background characters.
    I guess I’m just repeating myself, I bow to the depth of the other comments here.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.