Nooses are racial threats, not pranks

by Carmen Van Kerckhove

nooses workplace race racismThe New York Times ran a story yesterday on the rash of local incidents in which black people have found nooses left in their workplaces. I spoke to the reporter about why people cannot consider nooses to be mere “pranks.” They are serious cases of racial intimidation:

At least seven times in the past few weeks, nooses have been anonymously tossed over pipes or hung on doorknobs in the New York metropolitan area — four times here on Long Island, twice in New York City, once at a Home Depot store in Passaic, N.J. The settings are disparate. One noose was hung in a police station locker room in Hempstead, where the apparent target was a black police officer recently promoted to deputy chief. Another was draped over the doorknob of the office of a black professor at Columbia University.

…Lynching was not part of that history. But to some of those sifting the evidence, the nooses of 2007 represent much the same impulse as lynchings did in the Jim Crow South.

“In the context of today, the noose means, ‘There is still a racial hierarchy in this country, and you better not overstep your bounds,’” said Carmen Van Kerckhove, the founder of a New York consulting firm, New Demographic, that specializes in workplace problems, including racial tension.

The reporter also spoke to Rachel Sullivan from Rachel’s Tavern, who did a great job of providing a historical context for the nooses:

Rachel E. Sullivan, an assistant professor of sociology at Long Island University’s C. W. Post College, said most people do not understand what lynchings were. “They think it was a few guys coming in the night, in their hooded sheets, taking you away,” she said.

She teaches a course on African-American history, including the killings of thousands by lynching in the United States between the end of the Civil War and the end of the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

“But in reality these were whole, big community events,” she said. “Children and families would come to watch. Hundreds of people attended. They would watch a man being burned and mutilated before he was hung. They would pose for pictures with the body.

“If people had a grasp of what really happened at these things,” Professor Sullivan continued, “they would understand the power of the symbol of a noose.”

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. link garden: addicts, nooses, responsibility and solidarity at vegankid on 24 Oct 2007 at 11:04 am

    […] Nooses are racial threat, not pranks [racialicious] - i wish i could respond to this with a solid “duh”, but unfortunately we still aren’t there yet. “In the context of today, the noose means, ‘There is still a racial hierarchy in this country, and you better not overstep your bounds,’” said Carmen Van Kerckhove, the founder of a New York consulting firm, New Demographic, that specializes in workplace problems, including racial tension. […]

Comments

  1. Kai wrote:

    Very nice, Carmen! I like your quote about racial hierarchies and boundaries, that’s meaty stuff. Damn, you and Rachel are rockin it lately! :-)

    The only thing I’d add is that in my view nooses (real ones made of rope) are actually lethal weapons which you can use to kill people, not symbolically but very concretely. It’s a short step from tying and hanging a noose, to slipping it over someone’s head, know what I mean? Whereas with a pure symbol, say, a spraypainted swastika, it’s paint on a wall until somebody takes the next step of picking up a weapon (though of course the symbol is intended to evoke such thoughts). This doesn’t mean that all noose-hangers (wow, I can’t believe this is like a major group of people we’re discussing these days) are necessarily literally planning on killing somebody, but by taking that step of constructing the device they have created conditions which facilitate that act. So I guess my quasi-point is that a noose is of course a threat, but also beyond that an actual pragmatic 3-dimensional murder weapon.

    Well it’s a thought anyway.

  2. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    That’s a great point, Kai. I hadn’t thought of that, but you’re right. Nooses can be actual weapons.

  3. Lyonside wrote:

    This rocked like a rocking thing :)

    If I could add on to Kai, though - Weapon vs. non-weapon might bring an incident into different legal spheres (intimidation or assault w/ a deadly weapon, for instance), but I’d worry if it became the gold standard.

    I’d likely be as anxious, I think, about doll-size nooses or smaller ones (think of the size of the one that hung on Senator Macaca’s office ficus, for instance), because I know the context. Doesn’t matter to me if it fits over my big head or not, I’m still calling the damn cops :)

  4. Mike wrote:

    It is a form of intimidation and terroristic threat meant to cause a change in the people being intimidated. And it is the warning that some type of action will take place if the reason that noose was put up has not change. I do not know if you can call it a murder weapon any more than you can call a baseball bat or a lead pipe one until you put it to use. the original intent for making them was not to kill any one and I could be mistaken but I think the noose was not orignally designed to hang people. Anyway it is an act of a coward.

  5. Mike wrote:

    BTW R.I.P Lucky Dube.

  6. Robert B. wrote:

    I am really thinking that this posting is genius.

    What struck me though upon reading it was the analogy of the noose to the confederate flag.

    The confederate flag, which is touted as a symbol of the historical south, is never flown without the intent to alienate. All of the talk of the flag as a symbol of culture should be accepted. Say to a flag-bearer (pun intended) “Ok, you say it’s about culture, not about slavery”–then the next question should be, what culture?

    In what culture did the noose gain its notoriety? The Antebellum South. I know that where I am from (Michigan) the flag isn’t flown because my grandmother made some really good sweet tea and I want to remind her of it… Just like a noose, the flag stands for a viewpoint that reinforces hate and creates a cycle where the group alienated is forced to address the historical (and contemporary) implications.

    Let’s get rid of them both, what do you say :)

  7. eric daniels wrote:

    These idiots who post nooses should be charged with a hate crime and making a terrorist threat. If the majority is truly concerned about racial justice they would do the right thing and use the civil rights violations as a federal crime.

  8. patti wrote:

    I definitely percieve a noose as a death threat. Baseball bats are for hitting baseballs and lead pipes are for plumbing and of course these can be used to beat the crap out of someone. But a noose is for one thing and clearly means “I can kill you”. If that was not the original use for a noose, in this country in this time that is exactly and only what a noose means.

  9. SolShine7 wrote:

    All this noose stuff makes me sad. I thought that symbol was a thing of history but I guess not.

    And Carmen, well said.

  10. NayLah wrote:

    So I guess people are doing it so much now that the general public actually sees it for what it is - a hate crime….but lets see if anyone is prosecuted for it just like those who speak out against homosexuality in the pulpit….where are you ACLU??

  11. Roxie wrote:

    I consider them death threats. B/c the noose is the actual weapon…not representation.

  12. Fiqah wrote:

    Thanks again for this, Carmen. I’d like to encourage everybody to read “At The Hands of Persons Unknown: The Lynching of Black America” if they haven’t yet. It’s a super-thorough account of the history of race-based lynching in America, complete with photographs. The savagery evident in the pictures - many of which feature smiling White children posing with their parents next to mutilated corpses - is devestating. It’s not an easy read, but like so much ugliness, it must be confronted and acknowledged so that it can one day - hopefully - be healed.

  13. Luke Pharma wrote:

    Sat this one out for a spell and would’ve likely stayed silent, but I’m torn between the fight over symbols and actions.

    I’m not a fan of “hate crimes” because of the complicated turf they lead to. A crime is a crime, but saying I need to add “hate” to the mix in order to effectively prosecute it ironically serves to make the victim stand lower than that of a similar victim without access to such a channel.

    Criminalizing what people simply think and/or feel versus what they say versus what they actually do, is a challenge for the best of pure souls with telepathic skills. By whose standards would any sincere expression of displeasure *not* be a “hate” crime? That’s why any ACLU chapter worth it’s salt would challenge such a measure. If you can’t see the danger in punishing “hate” in this manner, just wait until your thoughts and statements become the issue…

    I also don’t believe in suppressing or criminalizing symbols I find offensive. It’s not about tolerance or acceptance, it’s practicality: I don’t want to increase their potency, validity, and credibility. More powerful symbols and strategies– including co-opting designs– have repeatedly proven more effective throughout history.

    For “noosemania”, history and context have been removed. I’d suggest they be reclaimed.

    Every time, every place a noose is sighted, mark a circle with a line through it, and either (a) the year of the first or last public lynching in America: or (b) the number of racial public lynching deaths in this country (including Byrd in TX RIP), with a simple “NO MORE” underneath.

    Other ideas welcome…

  14. Fiqah wrote:

    Luke Pharma: What an awesome idea!

  15. squidfly wrote:

    Just call it an act of Terrorism.
    The act of naming is a powerful tool.

  16. Emma wrote:

    Check out this revealing piece of history:

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedailymirror/2007/08/countdown-to–3.html#more

    So much for the idea that nooses were a threat then and a joke now because we’ve come so far. In the 1950’s, youngsters thought nooses were “fun,” too.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.