South Park Finally Comes Clean… Too Bad Nobody’s Looking

by guest contributor merq

“Well, you know why they’re like that, don’t you?” inquired that familiar, beloved voice in my ear. “It’s because they’re Jewish.”

If you live somewhere in these United States, chances are you have that friend or relative whose bigoted statements seldom fail to ruin a perfectly good time. Your light, breeze-shooting convo turns into an uncomfortable lecture if you call them out, or an agonizing battle with your conscience if you don’t.

Mine’s my dear old Great Uncle Arthur – proof if I ever needed it that the whole “I can’t be racist. I married a so-and-so” argument is pure bullshit. He spent 20 years married to Aunt Ethel, the original Absolut Jew.

For a long time, South Park has been like old Uncle Art – making you wince with its innate bigotry, but reminding the uninformed that racist != the debbil’s spawn – a reality that, if embraced, would result in a society more willing to acknowledge (and thus rectify) its prejudices.

But I digress…

I’ve always had a bit of a problem with South Park. For every halfway-decent piece of social commentary or transcendently funny comedic work it crafts, I’ve had to sit through tons of racist claptrap, excused only by the standard refrain, “hey, it’s just a cartoon!” by fans of the show and its creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone.

I’m no fan of Jennifer Lopez, but I found myself seriously skeeved by Parker and Stone’s gleeful depiction of the singer in the Fat Butt and Pancake Head episode. The entire episode skirts the line with its numerous “taco-burrito” references, but officially steps over the line when Lopez – a narcissistic, cartoonishly voluptuous “Mexican” – is arrested (by a cop who calls her “bean breath” and “Picante Pants,” natch). For reasons unexplained, the uppity Latina goes from living in fabulous wealth to chopping onions at a joint called La Taco. It is a come-uppance we’re supposed to revel in, for she has been put back in her place.

No better is the show’s treatment of black women. Far too often, it indulges in Craigslist-esque “morbidly obese black woman” sight gags – the kind often used to ridicule the very notion of black female beauty. Not even a now-slimmer Oprah Winfrey was spared such treatment by the animators.

Let’s not even get into the treatment of Tuong Lu “Shitty Wok” Kim and his oh-so-funny “Engrish.”

However, I tuned in for Wednesday’s season premiere with bated breath. As the teasers relentlessly reminded me, Eric Cartman, the hilarious personification of pure evil, would discover the wonder of Tourette’s Syndrome.

Some have asked how it is that I can so despise the bigotry on South Park, but love Eric Cartman so damn much. It’s fairly simple, I say. Like Uncle Ruckus on The Boondocks, he is so over-the-top in his racism that one never has to wonder if his ideas are being prescribed to the viewer. The more insidious evil always lay in the show’s creators.

So imagine my disappointment when the episode turns out a lackluster affair. Yes, Cartman discovers that kids who suffer from Tourette’s apparently get to curse with impunity. Yes, he unleashes stream after madlib-style stream of obscene phrases. Yes, I’m unable to suppress a yawn or three through all this.

No, he didn’t just call Kyle a “kike!”

Suddenly it became crystal clear. I remember explaining my main South Park gripe to a co-worker, as exemplified by their “Nigger Guy” episode.

Parker and Stone have somehow managed to convince the world that by throwing together a pseudo-topical episode every now and again, their show qualifies as a form of social commentary. It is with the carte blanche that comes with this classification that they get to glory in using the word “nigger” (unedited) forty-two times in a single episode.

In this episode, Cartman has somehow managed to convince the town that he suffers from Tourette’s Syndrome, and uses this as carte blanche to curse out his teachers and finally cross the K line (unedited) after years of comparatively restrained Anti-Semitism.

I’m sure the parallels are self-evident.

Parker and Stone really showed their asses this time, though. Much like Aaron McGruder did with The Boondocks, they’ve come to reveal themselves through the words and deeds of one of their characters. And like McGruder, I doubt they intended to.

Unfortunately, like with McGruder, I doubt anyone will call them on it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Sunday blogging against racism #11–rethinking Boondocks « I wanna love You better whatever it takes . . . on 21 Oct 2007 at 8:39 am

    [...] of Aaron McGruder’s The Boondocks (first a comic strip, now a syndicated television show) in a conversation about South Park (which, as its creators warn at the beginning of each show, “should not be watched by [...]

Comments

  1. achilles3 wrote:

    OK. But what are you saying?
    South Park and Boondocks should be taken off the air because you think the creators are racists?
    I’m new to the blog and maybe this is something you’ve already stated.
    Thanks,

  2. Anonymous wrote:

    Thanks for writing this, it was interesting. I didn’t see the episode in question, but I’ve seen my fair share of SP episodes and how gleefully offensive it can be to pretty much everyone. It’s usually more equal-opportunity than most shows on TV, so I cut them some slack in that they don’t spare anyone at all and yes, one can usually discern a nugget of genuine meaning and social commentary buried beneath the coarseness.

    And yes, sometimes it is hard to tell whether the creators/writers are being satirical or are using the idea of satire as a screen to get away with some plain-old racism (the N-word episode as you mentioned, is debateable). I always thought the “Shitty Wok” cook, however, was just blatantly racist. There’s really no satire or social commentary going on there.

    “Chinpokomon” was pretty blatantly offensive, by the way. I don’t know if you have any opinions on that, but I believe it was nominated for an Emmy for best animated episode or other. Its interesting because one of the creators of South Park, Trey Parker, married a Japanese American woman and a lot of his fans (mostly female, mostly crazy) have been virulently racist about it (check out fansite message boards complaining about Parker’s “gold-digging Jap wife”). And it hasn’t stopped SP, of course, from doing Asian jokes.

    I guess being married to someone different, like your grandfather and his wife, doesn’t mean you have to respect the difference.

  3. Yolanda Carrington wrote:

    Thanks for this analysis, merq. In a way, this uncritical acceptance of “South Park” by good liberals parallels what Thea was talking about Monday with hipster artists like Wes Anderson—because these guys are seen as cutting edge and revolutionary, fans and peers ignore or overlook the oppressive messages in their work. Or they assert the foolish idea that art and entertainment are above criticism—”He’s an artist,” or “I believe in the First Amendment” and all that.

    More than anything else, this free speech hypocrisy needs to be called out. If Stone, Parker, and McGruder have the right to spew racist/anti-semitic/misogynist/and everything else jokes, the rest of us have the right to call out their intellectual laziness and assholism. If these guys are half as gutsy as they pretend to be, they can sit down and hear their critics out. If they can’t, oh well…

  4. Anonymous wrote:

    My apologies in post #2– instead of “your grandfather” I meant your great uncle.

    #3: Excellent comment Yolanda.

  5. Jack wrote:

    I’ve seen people (me?) trip over the problem of being known by a small, divers group of friends as a racially sensitive person, and of being able to joke — satirically or sarcastically, of course — about racial stereotypes and laugh about the absurdity of human stupidity … and then bump into someone who *doesn’t* know the joker so well and he ends up being perceived as an insensitive boor. He forgets that he had to earn the leeway to talk about serious issues with tongue in cheek amongst his friends and that he has to keep reearning that right with every new person he meets.

    Sometimes I get the feeling that the South Park gang is in the same situation. They *might* be reasonable, they *might* be able to laugh at dumb-ass bigots by blowing them up larger than life, and they *might* have a few racially diverse friends who get it, too. But they’ve made the mistake of assuming the rest of the world is in on the joke. We can’t trust the intent of their comedy.

  6. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    “South Park” also savaged American Indians in the “Red Man’s Greed” episode. You can read about it here:

    http://www.bluecorncomics.com/southpk.htm

    Like Howard Stern (http://www.bluecorncomics.com/sob.htm), Parker and Stone claim to make fun of everyone. But do they? I don’t watch or listen to these people regularly, but from what I’ve seen, they attack “liberals” (women, minorities, environmentalists et al.) maybe 70% of the time and mainstream/conservative white persons and institutions maybe 30% of the time. If they were really “equal opportunity offenders” (http://www.bluecorncomics.com/offender.htm), those percentages would be reversed. They’d attack the big fat targets in government, business, churches, the military, etc. 70% of the time and tree-hugger/feminazi “radicals” 30% of the time.

    That their shows don’t follow these percentages tells you what their agenda really is: to promote a conservative/libertarian view of America.

  7. gandalf mantooth wrote:

    Nah. Come on. It’s rarely clear where they sit on the political spectrum, we can only trust they aren’t taking the piss when they claim themselves to be GOP. Still, they, like a lot of people (humorists especially), want to claim a position on both sides of the fence. They want to condemn bigotry with comedy while making “anti-PC” jokes.

    The show became so unfunny during the second Bush term (perhaps they were so down that their boy was doing so poorly?) that I stopped watching. I did watch this season’s premier, which was clearly about Imus/Michael Richards/whomever, and the controversy that ensued. To wit: one character noting that some people get so used to saying whatever they want, they forget it isn’t always okay to say whatever you want, whenever you want. As usual, their position is amibvalent, in this case the Imuses of the world are bad, but so are the people complaining.

    They’ve used comedy effectively to address racism. The “Chinpokoman” episode was mentioned, however that was about the new Yellow Peril. You all may recall that at the time many parents were all in arms about the doom that Japanese animation would bring to our kids. “They took our jobs” was the catch phrase to attack anti-immigrant fever, and the bit from the South Park film where Chef asks an oblivious racist military officer whether he had ever heard of the Emancipation Proclaimation and he responds that he doesn’t listen to rap music was classic.

    They’ve crossed the line many times in my mind, even in the cases I’ve lauded above. Their sophomoric revelling in “anti-PC” humor can be grating, moreso now that they’ve outed themselves as political conservatives. However, I don’t see them as hypocrites, especially when their points are so obviously broad.

  8. damia wrote:

    The South Park episode that made me turn of the tv and never watch the show again, was the incredibly transphobic episode they made a few years back. They didn’t even try to pretend that they were just being “edgy” with the social commentary or anything, it was just completely blatant trans-bashing (comparing SRS to getting surgery to change your race, or turn yourself into a dolphin…just, ugh).

    I also seem to remember them doing an episode about the evils of hate crime legislation.

  9. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Merq –

    Nicely done.

    I haven’t really watched South Park since the movie came out (ages ago).

    But I see where you are coming from with the Boondocks references.

    I’ve been a fan of the comic strips since they were in the Source, and loved the political/racial/hip-hop commentary. The show, however, is a bit different.

    While I still enjoy watching, the show doesn’t have the same feel as the comic strips. The focus is a bit different, as well as the target audience – when I heard way too many people praise the show by saying “Riley’s my nigga!” I wondered if the Boondocks had jumped the shark.

    However, I do wonder if this is the creator’s subconcious admission of racism…or the more mundane pandering to what works on a basic level. If the nuanced political jokes go over peoples heads, but people want to see more Riley, is this a business decision?
    Same with South Park – are the creators just producing what is popular?

    Or is it burnout? Like hip-hop stars sick of the machine they have created and now are forced to ride, are the creators resorting to more and more outrageous fare in hopes someone will finally kill the show (a la 21 Jump Street era Johnny Deep?)

  10. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    Slightly off-topic, but did anyone catch the latest episode of Family Guy, when Joe Swanson gets a leg transplant? I thought it was horrifically offensive to disabled people and was actually surprised they were able to air it.

  11. erin wrote:

    I never found south park to be racist.they make fun of any and everything. Matt Stone is jewish and there are so many anti semetic (spell check) slurs spoken by cartman towards kyle its crazy. The nigger guy episode to me was funny because randy was being ridiculed for using the word. He was placed in a group with Mark Ferman (spell check) and Kramer which was hilarious. The episode was making fun of how people don’t think before they say things. As far as the Oprah thing, they make her big because of her weight fluctuation. No matter how thin she is she will always be seen as fat.

  12. Fatemeh wrote:

    You’re writing the words that I’ve been thinking. I’ve never been comfortable with South Park (that episode with Les Bos and the persians kill me though, in all fairness), and you’ve finally been able to clarify why!

  13. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    By the way Merq –

    This was on Stereohyped – you may have more evidence for your Boondocks theory:

    http://www.mercurynews.com/eyeheadlines/ci_7145588?nclick_check=1

  14. BEat wrote:

    South Park is funny sometimes but not funny enough to overcome that niggling sense of “RACIST FCUKERS” in my mind

  15. Jack D. wrote:

    Does anyone ever notice that the vast majority of sheer stupidity is perpetrated by white (usually male) characters on South Park? Not only are white guys idiots, but they react with mindless group-think. The more ridiculous the premise, the more likely it is a light-skinned person is behind it.

    I’m not sure what that means. I think there’s a stereotype in it, somewhere, somehow.

  16. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    South Park always had a racist streak a mile wide.

    Along with an extreme homophobia (almost to the point where I’ve come to suspect Parker and Stone are deeply deeply deeply mired in Larry Craig-ish “wide stance” denial, and use the homophobia of their show to conceal their..for want of a better word …”homophilia”)

    [yeah, I know that's not a real word - but it does describe those two to a tee]

    I’d have to agree about the Boondocks too – McGruder has been trying to position himself as one of those Bill Cosby Blacks (”oh, but your different than other Blacks” – as White racists would say).

    Not to mention sexist – ever seen the episode entitled “Guess Ho’s coming to dinner”?

    In that episode, Granddad meets a pretty, busty and extremely scantily clad White prostitute in the mall.

    After buying her several thousand dollars worth of clothes – and a 1,000 pack case of condoms – (shown in a montage with Kanye West’s “Golddigger” as the soundtrack) he brings her home as a live-in-girlfriend.

    Eventually, after Huey and Riley trail her downtown and document her prostitution activities, her stereotypical Black pimp comes to take her back.

    My synopsis does not do justice to the extreme sexism of the episode (and to McGruder’s colorstruck attraction to light complexioned women as the standard of beauty that all other women fail to live up to).

    But yeah, like a lot of Hollywood racist “liberals” Parker, Stone and McGruder hide their racism, sexism and homophobia behind this false claim that they insult everybody (when in fact they only go after the least powerful – women, people of color and gays)

  17. Bronze Trinity wrote:

    I’ve become turned off by South Park and Family Guy too. i haven’t seen Boondocks. Its like by making it a comedy it makes overt racism okay because its supposed to be sending a message to not be racist. But after a while its hard to make that distinction. I think it would be especially hard for a child to make the distinction and we all know children are watching it because its syndicated. I think the same thing happened with hip hop. At first there was just a little racism and sexism to tell people that those things were wrong. Then it was overused so that its not as obvious why they are using the language. Then it starts to seem as thought he language is just entertainment and the message against such behaviour is lost.

  18. fiqah wrote:

    Gregory- this is neither here nor there, but the ho in question in that episode was black.

  19. Luke Pharma wrote:

    Funny as all hell, considering Parker & Stone, Macgruder, and Mcfarland have *never* made a secret of their biases throughout interviews, activities, or the industry.

    No, I think the real problem is that these talented folks don’t actually infuse enough of their sensibilities into their craft, relying on sheer attitude to substitute for the funny.

    This becomes dangerous in satire, especially when one lacks any genuine feeling at all towards an issue or refuses to take a stance on the figures or situations you’re lampooning. Satirists may express anger or affection, but rarely apathy. When it’s the latter, it betrays an antagonism towards the audience most of all.

    Note the difference, however, between all this and multiple agendas, open interpretations, and indeterminate intent.

    So I laugh at this crop of ethnic/racial animators for their ability to punch buttons, shock, and free us from the needs of good taste. After each show ends, though, I ask “what was the point of this episode?”

    That’s what’s frustrating. I don’t mind their conservative politics– it’s refreshing and informative when they actually choose to deploy it, and gives the satire bite. Without it, the satire merely seems scattershot and desperate, lazy and cynical without focus.

    I’m re-reading Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” tonight to remind me of how good provocative and offensive satire can be when it knows what it aims for and why.

  20. merq wrote:

    Thanks for the comments, everyone. It was thrown together in a bit of a rush, so I’m glad the idea wasn’t too muddled. (while on the subject, please forgive any errors in this post. long night of alcohol abuse…)

    Achilles3:
    Far be it from me to say what should and should not be on the air. I’m just pointing out racism where I see it. I always felt somewhat disturbed by South Park, and I found it funny that they finally exhibited the very trait I felt they embodied.

    I don’t care if they stay on the air — if they go, they’ll just be replaced by some Mencia/Silverman-esque bullshit that’s blatantly racist.

    SP’s whole act isn’t racism. It’s just a big part of it. Try saying that about Silverman/Mencia/Lampanelli.

    Rob Schmidt:
    This is true. I remember being pretty uncomfortable with the “Red Man’s Greed” episode, but I’d have to watch it again for specifics. Thanks for pointing that out.

    Also, I agree that under their “we attack everyone” banner, they seem to attack minorities and “liberals” a whole lot more than others.

    Gregory Butler:
    Actually, the “Guess Ho’s Coming…” episode featured a biracial prostitute. McGrusdedr has a serious thing about interracial “mixing,” and seldom misses a chance to attack it. But yeah, I agree with you in terms of its overall sexism. Just wanted to clarify the target of its racism.

    Latoya:
    Many thanks. I wish I could view the Mercury News bit. But despite the near-kismet-like nomenclature, it apparently requires that you sign up — something I’m unable to do in my present, booze-induced haze.

    Thanks again, everyone.

  21. el guante wrote:

    it’s funny– i just did a post about so-called “equal opportunity offenders” and how that phrase is used so often as an excuse to be a jackass, and i of course had to mention south park.

    i share a lot of the sentiments of the original post here and the comments, but the one place i find myself differing is with McGruder. i defintely see how Boondocks could be harmful when you consider who’s actually watching it– McGruder is writing satire that most of the show’s audience isn’t going to understand or appreciate (and will probably misinterpret)– but i don’t think he’s a hateful monster as that link seemed to imply.

    still, it’s one of those impact vs. intent things, and after reading this post i might be changing my mind on him a little. i still think he’s a brilliant, well-meaning guy, but is the impact his show having positive or negative in the greater cultural conversation? i think an argument could definitely be made for the latter.

    going to have to marinate on that one for a minute.

    this is my first comment here, by the way, but i’ve been reading every day for months now– GREAT blog.

  22. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    Fiqua – if the prostitute character in “Guess Ho’s coming to dinner” was Black, she was EXTREMELY lightskinned.

    She had green eyes, and brown hair (not brown from a bottle, brown from the roots).

    If she was Black, she was a Mariah Carey sista – a sista who’s biracial, with a Black parent who was pretty lighskinned to begin with.

    [Full Disclosure: I myself am biracial - Irish father, Black mother... but I'm not near as lightskinned as Mariah Carey - or as the woman in this episode]

    Now, it’s possible that McGruder intended the prostitute in that episode to be a very very very lightskinned Black woman – but she sure as hell looked White to me.

  23. Morgan wrote:

    I definately agree with all that’s said about “South Park” “Family Guy” and Sarah Silverman, but I can’t say that I see the same level in “Boondocks”. I have definately watched the show and gasped in disbelief that they could put some of the scenes on television, but I think a minority/underprivileged person spewing vitrol at his own community is different than white libertarians getting rich mocking everyone with less priviledge then themselves. There is a long tratidion in the Jewish community of this same thing (Philip Roth is a perfect example, Woody Allen more gently so) and I think it’s constured more as social commentary than Anti-Semitism.

    As for the “ho” episode, my friends and I read her as white but I wouldn’t be shocked if he did intend her to be biracial. I have always noticed some anger towards mixed marriages and women and general in the strip (I’m thinking of the neighbor with the white wife and how their relationship is portrayed). Sadly, I’m more accepting of sexism in media as a norm to tolerate.

  24. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    Merq –

    Here are the important pieces:

    Aaron McGruder, the Artist Formerly Known as the Angriest Black Man in America, can’t stop smiling. In fact, he’s busting up, bobbing and weaving as he reacts to the animation unfolding on his living-room-wall big screen. It’s from the new season of “The Boondocks,” the adaptation of his button-pushing hip-hop-flavored newspaper strip, centered on 10-year-old black militant Huey Freeman and his gangsta-wannabe younger brother Riley, who have to move from Chicago to live with their gruff grandfather in the suburbs.

    The appearance of one of the show’s breakout characters, Uncle Ruckus, a foul-mouthed black man who hates black people, makes the slim, unassuming McGruder laugh so hard that his outburst fills the room, even with the volume turned up to near ear-splitting levels. He’s further amused by his cartoon’s caricatures of Larry King, Bill Cosby and pundit Ann Coulter.

    And what made me want to cry:

    To reach this moment of contentment, McGruder, 33, decided that he needed to pay a heavy price – giving up the vehicle that not only brought him national fame and celebrity but had been the driving force of his life since college. In order to be happier with “The Boondocks – The TV Show,” he had to let go of “The Boondocks – The Strip.”

    He quit his daily satirical platform, which was syndicated in more than 300 newspapers nationwide, including the Mercury News, the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. His abrupt and unexpected departure shocked fans, and McGruder had few explanations as he crept from public view, turning down invitations for talk shows and speaking engagements.

    “I wanted to hang on to both, but ultimately I made the decision that the show could not be sacrificed,” McGruder says. ” . . . I didn’t want to do the strip badly and the show badly.”

    ***

    Personally, the strip held much more appeal than the show…

    Oh, and one final note from the article:

    A stinging parody of “Soul Plane,” the much-criticized movie that features Snoop Dogg and Mo’Nique, was a highlight of the first installment. A rapper named Thugnificent moves into the neighborhood where the Freemans live and turns the suburban area upside down. Uncle Ruckus, who calls blacks “monkeys” and worse, gets his own reality show and will become even more vindictive against his race.

    There’s also an episode dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

    And if Sharpton was upset over last season’s use of the N-word, he might consider polishing his marching shoes. It gets its own episode this season.

  25. lemure wrote:

    The “Ho” was a lightskinned Black woman. A friend of mine downloaded several Boondocks episodes into my computer. Its definitely a light skinned Black woman and I’m actually kind of surprised that isn’t immediately obvious to other Black people.

  26. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    Morgan,

    McGruder, despite being pretty lightskinned himself, does seem to have a problem with interracial marriages – and the children born of those marriages.

    Like the Du Bois family – a Black man, his White wife and their biracial daughter, Jasmine (who is clearly drawn so we can tell she’s biracial – down to and including her big wavy head of brown hair)

    Mr Du Bois is quite clearly presented as an Uncle Tom (I believe his actual FIRST NAME is TOM – yeah, Aaron really doesn’t do subtlety!)

    They had a whole episode based on Tom Du Bois’ morbid fear of being sodomized in jail (with an elaborate nightmare sequence of him in a prison shower, about to be raped by a large Black man with what appeared to be a very large penis)

    And in general, his character is presented as weak, spineless, effeminate and an all around wuss.

    Jasmine is presented as not particularly bright – her character actually thinks that Christmas is about celebrating the birth of our lord and savior Santa Claus!

    Yeah, McGruder has issues with interracial families (another thing I don’t like about him – since I’m biracial myself)

  27. anna wrote:

    Furthermore when the “equal opportunity offenders” make fun of white people(actually rare) they’re always old and fat, often poor. There’s nothing funny about spoiled young hipsters and frat boys?

    The only rich, privileged whites targeted are George Bush, Paris Hilton, or Britney Spears. But only after they became such hopeless and unpopular failures that it was completely safe to do so. How edgy to pick on a mother having a complete breakdown in public?

  28. Ike wrote:

    McGruder’s white characters in the TV show are negative caricatures as well. The old rich white guy is scheming, amoral, and money-grubbing. He even coerced Jasmine into running a child-labor lemonade stand. The old man’s son (or was it grandson) who is friends with Riley is just a thug and terrorist who is seen as a “hero” by white society.

  29. Morgan wrote:

    just watched it, Riley calls her “lightskinned”—I’m not black and neither are any of the people I watched the show with, I guess our assumption she was white is some sort of privilege-on-acid sort of thing.

  30. merq wrote:

    Gregory:
    Yes. Please see my previous post for my views on McGruder’s take on interracial relationships. Yes, DuBois’ first name is Tom. And no, dude can’t even spell “subtlety.”

    Ike and Morgan:
    Thanks for responding. This isn’t about who “gets it worse” on the show. However, the white characters, when depicted negatively, are treated as individuals, while the majority of the black characters are just one mass of “problem people.”

    Ed Wuncler (the old rich white guy) is actually George Bush senior, and his son is meant to be Dubya (hence his large “W” medallion). See episode 101 (”The Garden Party”) and 105 (”A Date With The Health Inspector,” which features young Wuncler’s buddy Gin Rummy — Rumsfeld… get it?) for more on that.

    Black characters and “black culture” are roundly assaulted as inherently negative. A soul food restaurant destroys an entire society in ep 110 (called “The Itis,” naturally), Martin Luther King returns in 2006 to call the black population a bunch of “niggas,” and… I’ve already discussed the “Granddad’s Fight” episode.

    In “…Fight” and the MLK ep (”Return of the King”), the word “nigga/er/whateverhelpsyousleepatnight” was used to describe black people who “act in an illogical, self-destructive manner.”

    Now, call it social commentary if you want. But I must then ask what the difference is between this ostensibly concerned use of the word “nigga” by black people and the original use of the word “nigger” by their generous plantation hosts.

    There is none, I say. Any pretense of “reappropriating the word as a term of endearment” goes out the window when the word, carrying the same meaning as it originally did, is used to differentiate oneself from “those” blacks.

    Bonus Douchebag Material:
    http://www.mixedmediawatch.com/2006/07/13/aaron-mcgruder-on-the-state-of-the-black-man/

  31. nobody wrote:

    I don’t watch South Park because that “type” of humor doesn’t appeal to me…however were I to watch it I think I would appreciate the racist character (although I’m brown skin) because hidden racism is much worse than “upfront” racism.

    Therefore, when someone is upfront about their racism you know where it is coming from. When racism is hidden you internalize it as being something wrong with “you” as a person. You start to question if there is something wrong with you the human being that is causing the racist’s negativity instead of going directly to the source and “choosing” to ignore or address the racist’s comments.

  32. hoo_boy wrote:

    Interesting bit on Silverman from The Nation:

    http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071015/bolonik

  33. Mike wrote:

    I’ve followed both South Park and Boondock since they hit the national stage, and what I see are creator running out of steam and using shock value as a crutch. The first two seasons of SP to me were intended to push the discomfort level of people with race, religion and sex and force them to deal with it. But as the show progressed it relied more on slapstick type comedy and seemed to lose focus. The Boondock cartoon while not on the same level of the comic strip I don’t believe deserves to be put in the catagory of SP. All the characters including Huey are over the top views we would have of people of different belief and race. The thug, the tragic mullato, the interracial couple, the self hating black, wanna be whites, the MAN, uncle Tom, The militant black, all these charactes have been defined and blown to cartoon levels in real life and McGruder is just repeating back what is in our minds and what makes us uncomfertable because some of us might see ourself in there. The only real character in the cartoon to me is the grandfather who with wisdom from age does not seem to want to be bothered with everyones hang ups and seems irritated but forgiving when forced upon him, as in the episode of him playing checkers with Uncle Ruckus. The real threat of these shows are the viewers who get there kicks out of the comedy and shock of these shows but can’t process the bigger picture of what the creators are trying to say. It’s the real reason I believe Dave Chappelle shut down his show. He got tired of people walking up to him and spitting out catch phrases and episodes of the show like I’m Rick James BI@ch!! And Not seeing the tragedy behind what he was saying.
    P.S.
    What race you saw the hard to label Ho in the Boondocks should give you some insight on how your own mind works interms of race and women. I saw her as white.

  34. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    merq -

    Aaron McGruder is the Bill Cosby of our generation – unfortunately, unlike Cosby, who was a racial pioneer in his youth and a philantropist in middle age who only turned on us in his dotage, McGruder has gone straight to anti Black racism.

    Mike -

    I see we both percieved the prostitute as White.

    The naturally straight and naturally light brown hair, the green eyes, the Caucasian complexion ect.

    Yes, Riley called her “a lightskinded ho”.

    But my theory on that is this. Riley’s character had lived in an all-Black environment until his granfather moved him and Huey to a virtually all White suburb.

    So, he probably had never shared a residence with a White person before, let alone had a White woman as a de facto stepmom.

    In his mind he could only process her as a very lightskinned Black person – which is why he called her “lightskinded”.

    I’m basing that theory on real life experience – my ex girlfriend, a Black woman, grew up in a 100% Black and Latin housing project. When she met me, she had never met a biracial person before, and the concept truly puzzled her (”oh, you’re White, AND you’re Black???)

    Even after 12 years of dating, she never fully grasped the concept of a person being biracial.

    Whatever McGruder intended her to be, the woman was drawn like a White woman.

    Compare the prostitute character to Jazmine, a regular character who is the biracial daughter of the interracial family next door.

    It’s VERY clear that Jazmine is biracial – her distinctively long yet kinky hair and her skin color make it obvious (especially to anybody who’s ever spent time around biracial women – McGruder’s animators got the biracial Black woman’s hair thing 100% right with Jazmine).

    Finally, on the Chapelle Show comparison – yes, indeed there is a HUGE portion of the audience of both those shows who are White folks who are watching to laugh AT Black people, rather than to laugh WITH us.

    That’s why Chapelle walked away from $ 250 million dollars (the biggest deal in basic cable history).

    And that’s why Dave Chapelle is a God to me – anybody who’d walk away from that much money just because of PRINCIPLES is a prince among men!

  35. penny wrote:

    Having watched South Park from the start, and the movie… I don’t think there’s a single group, religion, disability or self-important celebrity that hasn’t been skewered mercilessly. Plus, a child gets murdered and usually eaten by rats in nearly every episode.

    It’s supposed to be offensive. That’s what makes it so freakin’ funny!

  36. merq wrote:

    Gregory:
    Interesting points, but I seriously doubt Riley was given nearly that much complexity in thought.

    Using the beauty habits of an eight-year-old as a yardstick for a working prostitute is not exactly guaranteed to give accurate results. Prostitutes (at least the ones who don’t have the “fuck effort” philosophy), like most in the sex industry, tailor their appearance to suit someone’s beauty ideals, so the idea that Cristal encountered some relaxer/peroxide/weave hair is not too far fetched, in my opinion.

    However, I may be wrong. I may have based my perception of her race on the allusion Riley made to Mariah Carey.

    Oh, and dude… TWELVE YEARS?

    Whoa. I tip my hat.

  37. lorraine wrote:

    hmmm . . . I want to make the same point about both South Park and McGruder, but if I was asked to defend my position for one of the two, it would be for McGruder.

    I do believe that both are satire–well, if the South Park creators are really conservatives, then I take it back on that side–but I have to admit that I am a bit shocked to hear the anti-Boondocks/anti-McGruder talk. Granted, I am a white woman, but (not sure how to say this without sounding hokey/ignorant, but here goes) I feel like I have really learned a lot/been made aware of stuff via the Boondocks cartoons. Do I think the TV show is far less funny and pushes things in the wrong direction? Absolutely, but sadly, I still watch it.

    As long as Cosby has been mentioned, I will say that I struggled with the same thing with the whole “Fat Albert” issue. When a professor told my class that Fat Albert was embraced by the black community when it first came out, I was shocked, because in my family, Fat Albert was used to mock black folks and to reinforce the stereotypes. It’s part of how we learned these horrible stereotypes. Even as an adult, I heard her say this and couldn’t get my mind around the fact that anybody would see Fat Albert as a positive thing.

    I’ve never (before today) had these questions about Boondocks–okay, scratch that. I HAVE had these questions about the TV show, because as one person mentioned above, it’s going out to a wider audience and is going to be misinterpreted by the folks in Iowa (and yes, in Staten Island, where I grew up) in the same way. But the comic strip is, to me, a totally different animal, and I feel like I was repeatedly given a glimpse into the struggles that the black community faces by reading it. (I still read the comic daily–it’s in “reruns”/syndication–and it’s funny because right now it’s dealing with the 2000 (or maybe 2004?) elections, and it still speaks perfectly well to the current presidential race . . .

    Finally, I think I learn about myself as a “trying to be the cool white woman” person–I see way too much of myself in the eager, trying to be “hip-hop” (to quote Brenda Salter-McNeil’s use of the term) white girl who wants to be “down with the people”. I see myself and wince, and isn’t that what good satire should cause us to do?

    hmm. I’ve said a lot here. I think I’m going to blog this as well.

  38. Mike wrote:

    Gregory

    12 years and could’nt get it right? You got to be playing. I subscribe to the fact that “ghetto girls are more fun” but if not education intelligence is a requirement. Your a saint for sticking it out that long.

    The Chappelle show is tragic to me because it worked on so many levels. But thats what happens when you are an entertainer who has cross over appeal with socially provacative material, you start to become a cartoon. Hip-Hop is another example P.E. had a big white fan base but they were more drawn to the beats and rebel nature of the group than any real interest in what they were saying. It is like thay are out on vacation or safari, they enter another culture enjoy the perks, shake there head at the struggle than go back to there safe homes with some souviners.

    penny
    “It’s supposed to be offensive. That’s what makes it so freakin’ funny!”
    Don Imus, the noose craze thats going on, Dunbar village, Dafur there all offensive to me, I fail to see the humor.

  39. Gregory A. Butler wrote:

    merq -

    Maybe a lightskinned prostitute could sufficiently process her hair that she could appear to have White hair – but she really couldn’t do too much about her skin color.

    And, even with the hair – if you know what to look for, you can tell if a woman is biracial by her hair texture – it’s usually at a midpoint of wavy/semi kinkiness between White and Black hair – it’s actually pretty distinctive, and pretty much all of the biracial women I know have hair like that.

    Even with processing, it still has that distinctive look.

    Of course, sistas like Mariah Carey are an exception to that broad generalization.

    But, then again, with her money, I’m sure she can afford really highly skilled stylists.

    As for my ex girlfriend and her inability to comprehend me being biracial – yes, I was with her for 12 years (and I still talk to her on the regular) and she still hasn’t quite grasped the concept of my racial background.

    Yeah, I don’t understand it either – I’ve only explained my background to her 2,000,000 times!

    But, that’s one of the reasons she’s my EX girlfriend!!!!

  40. shydcgirl wrote:

    Great points about SP merq, but I am a fan, always have been, I like that there is no “filter” if you will, on who is picked on. But I’m one person. Now I would like to address movies like Pretty Woman – she was a hooker, and Indecent Proposal – $1,000,000 to sleep with your wife. Major motion picture studios get away with it, with a larger audience, so what to do? People think awww Julia Roberts is so cute, ahem: hooker. Period. Demi Moore is someone’s wife, accepting the money makes her: a hooker. So the boondocks episode just doesn’t hold that much weight with me, sorry. TV just happens to be closer and more accessible, which may be why folks are so outraged.

  41. Colin wrote:

    Boondocks and South Park are both quite racist, indeed, and I don’t particularly understand how it can be that, especially in this era where the n-word is being eschewed by black elites and even OUTLAWED, albeit symbolically (one could ask, wtf was the purpose of even involving legislation…) I can only wonder why the Boondocks TV show hasn’t gotten the same sort of heat from the supposed black leadership throughout America.

    Sometimes I really feel the NAACP and Urban League and the Revs. Sharpton and Jackson and Drs. Cosby and Poussaint and all the usual suspects really won’t attack anything any black people do to each other until white people attack it first. But that’s something else entirely.

    South Park is just too popular to just take on and beat socially or politically. That’s strategy talking. Speaking on principles, I think SP is one of the prime suspects of continual racism in the media today. It’s like a spore of hatred that other people have fed off for a decade now, like Silverman and Mencia, and I think Dave Chappelle benefited from it, although I liked his message much more. I used to be mildly into South Park until my first week at college when a white kid called me Token for being the black kid to hang out with them for once. I, not being the biggest SP fan, inquired as to what they meant and was told it was a character from the show.

    In the SP reality, “token” is not an attempt at de facto segregation and an incredibly offensive label for trendbreaking black people, it’s just the name for a black person who happens to physically be in white people’s realm. The fact that months later, other whites and even Latino students called me by the same name was, to say the least frustrating, but also confirming this thought process.

    Without being too shrill, let me say, South Park is not just some edgy cartoon, it is about resetting racist cultural trends in our society to where they were years ago. Open racism is now social commentary, anti-racism is political correctness and ingroup/outgroup mentality is reality, not conception, if we continue to listen to this SP bile.

    Boondocks, on the other hand, strikes me, as a child’s attempt at being rebellious more than anything big. With all the articles out about how McGruder likes to be flip and condescending to the very people who lavish him with awards and praise, I get the impression that McGruder just thinks he’s the hottest thing since sliced bread, and I believe that hubris may lead to him losing his show soon. And this time I will actually put money on it. No lie.

  42. Fiqah wrote:

    My sincere apologies in advance my fellow posters for beating the proverbial dead horse. I was really hoping that someone else would address this, or failing that, it would at LEAST cease to irk me.

    But Gregory. GREGORY. Damn. I am having some disturbing race-ja-vu with the whole light-skin-straight-hair-couldn’t-possibly-be-just-a-Black-woman thing. Black people come with a whole extremely-varied range of skin, eye, and hair colors/textures. What this means is that it is not completely far-fetched that a self-identified Black person, with two self-identified Black parents, may not be what some would consider identifiably or mark ably Black. Just ask my mom, the red-haired green-eyed freckled Black Nationalist product of two identifiably Black parents. This is obviously a product of multigenerational mixing, one of this country’s oldest legacies. Likewise, someone with parents from two different ethnic backgrounds may not be what some would consider identifiably or markedly “mixed.” The fact of the matter is that you cannot always “tell.”

    And I thought that that was why McGruder drew the now over-discussed Cristal the way he did. Ambiguity – racial, sexual, ethnic, whatever – puts people in a weird place gives them a tendency to reveal more about themselves than they would if presented with something cut-and-dried. This isn’t to say that McGruder isn’t harboring some serious resentment towards mixed-race/bicultural people (AND women in general). It’s just to show that this discussion thread alone has helped illustrate part of what is still the problem in our color-struck, race-obsessed society.

  43. Colin wrote:

    So, Fiqah, is it possible that in his fits of idiocy, Mr. McGruder may have stumbled onto a sociopolitical critique?

  44. Fiqah wrote:

    Colin: LOL, possibly. It’s kinda hard to tell. I may be giving McGruder more credit than he deserves.

  45. S wrote:

    @ Fiqah’s post #42:

    Thank you! Great point, although I’m not sure why in 2007 it still has to be explained. Maybe some people live sheltered lives, don’t get out much, or just aren’t exposed much to black history, culture, etc. But dang, even a lot of white people know that black people run the whole rainbow spectrum as far as skin, eye, and hair color (and biracial children can definitely be whiter than white folk). I grew up with a red headed, freckle-faced yet brown skinned black girl myself (nick name was Red). Several of my cousins children have blue and green eyes – with no known trace of white people within the last 6 generations. Many of these children are very fair skinned despite their mostly dark lineage.
    I thought it was obvious that the “ho” in question was casted as light skinned black. Riley calling her light skinned eluded to this. Most black people I know don’t refer to white people as “light skinned”. They call them white. regardless of where you grew up.

    Back to the original subject, I too, have found myself uncomfortable with some of SP’s episodes, specifically the one where they make fun of Jon Benet Ramsey’s parents…that went waaay to far! Boondock’s is like a mix of Self Hatred and Uncle Tom Syndrome. There have been a couple funny episodes, but they are so riddled with sexism and the N word that I can’t watch on a regular basis. On, oh, how they depict Jasmine…fragile, naive, “blackless”, etc…nope, I can’t be a regular watcher.

  46. merq wrote:

    But dang, even a lot of white people know that black people run the whole rainbow spectrum as far as skin, eye, and hair color (and biracial children can definitely be whiter than white folk).

    Tell that to the posters who come on here, cursing at anyone who disagree with their notion that folks like Will Smith and Jada Pinkett-Smith are “obviously part-white.”

  47. S wrote:

    Hey, I said a lot, I didn’t say all. You’re gonna have a group of silly people in every race with comments that don’t make sense.

    Merq, didn’t you know that ANYONE who is successful or attractive is only successful and attractive because they are part white? :)

    Does anyone know if one of the SP creators is dating a black chick? I thought I heard that somewhere.

  48. genq10 wrote:

    South Park is so offensive that the only thing to do is laugh. It’s deliberately over-the-top.

    What bothers me about the Boondocks is this: it’s not a bad show, in fact, I’d even say that it’s funny. I just don’t want any white person to see it. Ever.