links for 2007-07-11

Comments

  1. Luke Pharma wrote:

    Re Jack & Jll: I known Ann Hornaday to be a sincere and thoughtful critic on this topic before. Her reading, while indeed very cursory, does hit upon a key point: there has always been multiple agendas at work in how the Civil Rights legend gets portrayed such that ultimately the real comprehensive story pushes everyone to the margins.

    This particular post irked me, as the topic generally does, for the *need* to make what is by necessity a messy complex unresolved yet inclusive story of accidental heroes, unlikely collaborators, villians with heavy souls, and chance.

    Why I worry: many of the best Civil Rights stories devolve to “feel good” uplift, earnestness to the point of sterility or blandness, or “punish the all the whiteys” excess, using the same figures ad naseum, and focusing too much on Americans and White America as the catalyst.

    This isn’t an 1865 Amercan story. This extends back to the Abolitionist movement. See:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolitionism

    As long as this is routinely overlooked, we’ll have a need for more stories that connect more loose threads– good and bad. And I don’t mean documentaries only– I mean films that rescue these figures from history’s recesses.

    Sexism, homophobia, turf wars within the ranks? White and Jewish roles in the founding the NAACP? True story of “Uncle Tom’s Cabin’s” creation and impact? Film anthology based on slave narratives? Frederick D.’s biopic? The abolitionists themselves? Why haven’t they been touched?

  2. Angel H. wrote:

    re: “‘Flash Avoids Stereotypes”

    The new incarnation of Ming will drop the “Merciless” appellation from his name.

    Then why did the first commercial I saw for the new series look like this?:

    MING

    [some shadowy guy in a robe floating]

    THE MERCILESS

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.