Attack of the GIANT NEGROES!!

by guest contributor David Mills, originally published at Undercover Black Man

Gather round, dear readers, and you will hear of a time when “giant negroes” roamed the earth. These giants committed shocking crimes. Newspapers from sea to shining sea documented their foul deeds.

Especially the New York Times.

The Times first acknowledged the existence of these fearsome creatures on August 5, 1897. The headline was “Insane Negro Giant in Newark.”

Over the next four decades, the New York Times provided all the news that was fit to print about “giant negroes.” Articles with headlines such as these:

“Giant Negro Attacks Police.” [Sept. 24, 1900]

“Negro Giant Guilty.” [July 28, 1905]

“Armed Negro Giant Goes Mad on Liner.” [May 15, 1916]

“Seize Giant Negro, Hide Him for Safety.” [December 24, 1922]

“Giant Negro Disables 4 Policemen in Fight.” [June 12, 1927]

“Posse in Gun Battle Ends Giant Negro’s Reign of Terror…” [March 6, 1932]

And it wasn’t just the New York Times. Rampaging black giants were a nationwide phenomenon. Naturally, headline-writers at major newspapers were all over this:

“Officer Is Hurt By Giant Negro.” [Atlanta Constitution, April 2, 1906]

“Giant Negro, a Walking Arsenal, Believed He Was To Be Burned Alive.” [Los Angeles Times, October 15, 1908]

“Giant Negro, Trapped, Seizes and Throws Officer.” [Los Angeles Times, March 28, 1911]

“Wife of Hotel Proprietor and a Giant Negro Sought.” [Chicago Tribune, January 23, 1916]

“Giant Negro Gambler Flees After Shooting Two on Windsor Street.” [Hartford Courant, December 11, 1922]

And who could forget this all-time classic:

“Capture Giant Negro Moron at Gary…” [Chicago Tribune, November 21, 1926]

The Washington Post, for some reason, avoided the term “Giant Negro” in its headlines. But not in its news copy. For decades, the Post, too, alerted its readership to the violent doings of gigantic black men.

On October 10, 1902, the Post reported on a preacher who went berserk after a revival meeting. “For ten hours…, Rev. Lewis Roy, a giant negro, of Little Washington, Rappahannock Country, Va., terrorized the whole southern section of the county, and had a posse of armed men searching for him.”

On September 6, 1909, it was the tale of William Stockett – “the giant negro who attempted suicide Friday night by shooting himself in the head, but subsequently attacked the physicians, attendants, and nurses on two occasions and freed himself from a strait-jacket…”

This report, published on April 10, 1912, was datelined Louisville, Ky.: “Cooped up in a room with a giant negro, two policemen battled for their lives here tonight, and when the negro finally fell dead with five bullets in his body both officers were covered with blood and nearly prostrated.”

On December 31, 1928, the Post ran an Associated Press account of a cop-killer in New Jersey. “David Ware, giant negro, was arrested tonight for the slaying of State Trooper Peter Gladyes, while one of the most extensive man hunts in which aircraft, bloodhounds and troops participated, was in progress.”

As late as December 17, 1944, there was the story of a young “Government girl” who fended off a street robber. “Suffering from a possible skull fracture as the result of the attack, Miss Gladys Lavender, 17, a Navy Yard clerk, told police ‘a giant negro’ attempted to snatch her purse….”

(I apologize if some of you will have trouble sleeping tonight.)

I am fascinated by all these giant Negroes. But I want to focus on the New York Times coverage, for several reasons.

First, based on my electronic searches through six newspaper databases, the New York Times used the phrase “giant negro” more than all the others.

Second, publisher Adolph S. Ochs – the man who transformed the Times into a world-class news organization – disdained the sensationalistic tone of the more successful New York papers (owned by Pulitzer and Hearst) during the heyday of “yellow journalism.” Upon taking over the Times in 1896, Ochs promised “to conduct a high-standard newspaper, clean, dignified and trustworthy.”

Clean. Dignified. Trustworthy. Like this report from New Orleans, published on September 24, 1900:

“A terrific fight occurred this morning between the police and a crazy negro whom they were attempting to arrest. A negro of gigantic build named Edward Gurley, laboring under the hallucination that he had been called to heaven, cut the throat of his nephew, Oscar Montgomery, in order that he might take him along with him.”

(Gurley was killed after he attacked two police officers “with savage ferocity.”)

The third reason I’m concentrating on the New York Times is because of an irony. Adolph Ochs also happened to have a leadership role in the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. According to the ADL’s website:

“Early on, ADL took significant steps to eradicate the negative images of Jews in print…. The League was still in its infancy when Adolph S. Ochs, publisher of The New York Times and an ADL executive committee member, wrote a memo to newspaper editors nationwide discouraging the use of ‘objectionable and vulgar’ references to Jews in the media. … By 1920, the practice had virtually stopped.”

Yet here’s how the Times described armed robber David Mitchell on September 27, 1927 (in “Chain Store Thugs Trapped At Last; ‘Black and White’ Team, Giant Negro and White Youth, Staged 100 to 200 Hold-Ups”):

“Tall, stocky, powerfully built and with a huge chest and arms, he impressed every one who saw him as thoroughly ‘hardboiled’ yet primitive.”

(Not sure what “primitive” means. Perhaps he went about barefooted, wearing animal skins. Wait, no… the reporter probably would’ve mentioned that.)

Upon discovering the NYT’s long-lost tales of giant Negroes, the first thing I wondered was… just how gigantic were they actually? Alas, the suspects’ height and weight were rarely reported in these stories.

One exception was “Giant Negro in Prison,” published on June 21, 1903: “ ‘Big’ Scott, alias Charles Scott… who for years has terrorized negroes, was arrested Friday night by Detective Boyle of the West Thirty-seventh Street Station as a suspicious person. Scott is a negro and stands 6 feet 4 inches.”

Then there was Livingstone Drummond, the focus of a 1922 Times article (“Seize Giant Negro, Hide Him for Safety”). Arrested for “highway robbery, atrocious assault and attempted murder,” Drummond also measured 6-foot-4. He weighed 215 pounds.

Six-foot-4. That’s big. But giant big?

Apparently the definition had grown looser since this 1897 story (“Insane Negro Giant in Newark”): “Lemuel Footz, a giant negro, went insane to-day, and after attempting to kill his wife roamed the streets for half an hour clad only in an undergarment. He was finally captured, and committed for an examination. … Footz is nearly seven feet tall.”

Now that’s a giant Negro.

In the coming days, I will share more stories of giant Negroes from the pages of the New York Times (and elsewhere). And I’ll tell you right now, not all “giant negroes” were bad. In fact, one of them saved the life of a U.S. president!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. CNN misses the point of the 7-Eleven Apu Simpsons controversy at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 11 Jul 2007 at 2:21 pm

    [...] into the public consciousness using popular culture and the media, even better. Exhibit A: giant Negroes. Exhibit B: rat-eating [...]

  2. Parting Shots / Stereohyped on 11 Jul 2007 at 5:07 pm

    [...] Beware the Giant Negro. And I’m not talking about Shaq. [RCLCS] [...]

  3. Mike Tyson's uncensored quotes at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 23 Jul 2007 at 7:01 am

    [...] I don’t know if this is funny, enraging or just sad. I guess this is the psychological damage that happens when your whole career is based on being a Giant Negro. [...]

Comments

  1. gatamala wrote:

    However did they deal without tazers!! Nowadays, the giant negro has taken angel dust and is crazed with superhuman strength (Rodney, I’m talking about you). In 2007, giant negroes are 5′3″-7′5″, 130-330 lbs, 14-85 years old. A mean muggin’ mugshot on the 6:00 news will do nicely.

    -I wonder to what extent the giant negro is a deliberate attempt to deflect racial animosity towards others.

    -At what point did the giant negro become the big black guy?

  2. Kenny wrote:

    The Black male as beast is an old ploy that has existed in America for centuries. It still affects the way many think of Black males.It also affects the way they are portrayed and not portrayed in the media and in Hollywood.

  3. Stef wrote:

    As a “little white girl” married to a “big black guy” (like Gatamala pointed out, that phrase is today’s “giant negro”), this hit home with me. My husband is 6′4″, 260 lbs and I am 5′4″, 120lbs, so in addition to the racial difference we have a sizable size difference between us. I think people have an idea that couples should look like each other, but we really don’t at all. I get the impression that people feel we can’t have a lot in common, because of our physical differences. I guess, physically, we are an unlikely pair to most people. I think a lot of this has to do with his size. Not only am I with a black guy, I’m with a Big Black Guy™!

    I think his size totally plays into people’s perceptions of him. People are always marveling over how calm and laid-back he is. This is true, but would it stand out to people as much if he were a smaller guy? It’s like they expected him to be aggressive or something, and it seems like this expectation is linked to his size. Then, once people get to know him, they often remark that he is a “teddy bear” (read: he’s a big guy, but, hey! he’s actually pretty nice!).

    Thanks for this interesting article.

  4. baldilocks wrote:

    Stef said:

    I think his size totally plays into people’s perceptions of him. People are always marveling over how calm and laid-back he is.

    My (step)dad experiences this also. He’s six-three and I don’t think I’ve ever heard him raise his voice. Many of my boyfriends (and my ex-husband) were very intimidated by him, however.

    The only guy I know who wasn’t intimidated by him upon introduction is my brother-in-law. Says a lot.

  5. Rob wrote:

    Its a problem of any Black guy whos got any muscle on him. I’m 5′8″ and 185, yet because its a solid 185 I get the stereotype. It doesn’t help that I tend to be quiet and keep to myself as it tends to make people even more cautious of you like you are likely to just snap one day on them or something.

  6. cw wrote:

    Now I see where the connection with the King Kong characterization began.

  7. gatamala wrote:

    Stef – so he gets the teddy bear (aka gentle giant) reactions! Anything but a “man” (albeit large). Even Ruben Studdard refers to himself as a teddy bear to make him non-threatening – especially paired next to (strike) his “little white” (/strike) Clay ;)

    Note how giant negro segues into magical negro: Michael Clarke Duncan

  8. Stef wrote:

    gatamala–Good point. If he’s not fulfilling the stereotype, then he’s an anomaly. He can be a giant or a teddy bear–but not just a regular guy. It’s a shame, because he *is* such a nice, regular guy. I think he is aware that his size and race combines to intimidate others. That’s why, when walking, he’ll go ahead and cross the street if he is coming upon a lone woman pedestrian.

  9. Vee wrote:

    I read about those articles in a book about Cocaine, the Unauthorized biography. The book mentioned articles like this particularly from the NY times. There were reports on crazed gigantic blacks on (insert drug here) running wild.

    I laughed when I read about the articles a couple of years back because they sound like a comedy sketch but when I see current examples of Big Black Guys and how they’re treated it puts everything into perspective and the laughter stops.

    One of the most recent Big Black Guys who just wouldn’t stay down was Rodney King. So you know excessive force was necessary.

  10. Sewere wrote:

    I’m surprised the “Giant Negro” scare doesn’t have a “wild and crazy hair” component to it (or maybe I missed it). Wearing dreadlocks in a professional environment often makes for interesting conversations and situations.

    But then again, that’s something that has been part and parcel of the shit Black Women continue to face .

  11. Cheb wrote:

    I have never met a Giant Negro. Met a few big humans. Some, pretty damned big.

    This is all racist. Nothing more, nothing less. You gotta recognize this crap when you see it and call it as you see it.

    I’m a 6′3″ and 190# caucasian. My girlfriends have all been size 1 to 5. It’s all a matter of depth perception, I think.

    I’m not ‘big’ and I’m certainly not a giant. Nor are they. We’re all humans. WTF is the matter with people?