Racism as a Lifestyle Choice

by Racialicious Special Correspondent Latoya Peterson

Listening to people rationalize their racism is both hilarious and infuriating.

This week, Carmen posted a link to a RaceWire posting about an article that explored one white woman’s journey into racism.

Initially I viewed the post with skepticism. My neighbors made me racist? Are you kidding? I perused the article, made a comment, and thought that would be the end of that. However, the rationalization of racist behavior continued with TAN pointing me toward a Washington City Paper article I had skipped last week, once again featuring a white woman spinning the same “woe-is-me, I-turned-into-a-racist completely by accident” spiel.

Okay, so now there are two white women, taking their “Oops, I did it (racism) again” moments to the press. Is this indicative of a trend? I decided to re-examine the two pieces with a more objective eye. After all, life experiences do contribute to the development of character - the idea that adverse life experience could influence feelings of racism is not so far-fetched.

The article in the St. Petersburg Times introduces the article with Cathy Salustri typing out:

I’m a white woman living in a black neighborhood, and I’m turning into a racist because of it.

The article goes on to detail her transition into racism:

As she wrote, she realized that the journey from tolerance to prejudice began two years ago when she moved to St. Petersburg’s Bartlett Park. Her Realtor, her parents, even her black friends told her that moving there was a mistake.

She didn’t listen. One of her white friends lived nearby and had no problems. She figured her experience would be no different. She took all the precautions Realtors suggest. She researched the neighborhood. Most of the crimes there were minor. She drove through at night and never saw any strange activity.

It was affordable; she could pay the mortgage with her income as a freelance writer. After multiple visits to the 1925 bungalow, she paid $72, 500. She closed June 10, 2005.

The first six months, things were good. […]

The thefts started in December 2005. First a ladder. Then, a folding chair, a weed whacker, a Volkswagen carburetor. This past April, a scooter. When a suspect - who is black - was found with the scooter, something in Salustri switched.

Stereotypes ricocheted through her head.

He’ll be dead before he’s 30.

The slur she won’t say out loud blared in her brain. […]

Last month, she went to court, where the scooter suspect appeared on drug charges. She needed to see his face, she said. “If I saw him on the street, I wanted to know the guy who stole my scooter.” In court, he smiled and waved at the people sitting on the right side of the gallery. Most of them were black.

That’s when Salustri lost it.

It was bigger than the suspect. She was disgusted with every black person in the courtroom. She didn’t know their stories and didn’t care.

F- - - - - - lowlifes.

Okay, let’s recap.

This woman moved to a cheap, affordable neighborhood in a not-so-great area. She was aware of minor crime issues in the neighborhood. And yet, she is shocked when her personal items were stolen.

The article does not indicate an armed robbery.

The article does not indicate forced entry into her home.

The article summarizes the missing items as follows: a ladder, a folding chair, a weed whacker, a Volkswagen carburetor and a scooter.

I am going to make a reasonable assumption - these items were left either outside of the house, or in a garage.

So, in sum, Cathy Salustri decided all black people are “fucking lowlifes” because she was the victim of petty property theft.

Maybe it is just me, but I was expecting a little something more to her story. A dramatic account of sexual assault, prolonged street harassment, an armed robbery.

Hell, I would have even taken a “stringy headed ho” insult.

But none of these things occurred. Cathy Salustri took a minor situation (which would probably be rectified with a shed and a padlock) and used it to justify her inherently racist thoughts.

As a student, I go to school to learn. I expect the environment to be safe. However, I should note that I have lost about $200 in electronics to theft since I have attended middle school, high school, and college. Three portable CD players, a cassette player, and two CD cases have walked away from me. Does this mean I stop going to school because I’ve been robbed? Does this mean all my fellow students are “fucking lowlifes?”

I interpreted all the theft to mean I needed to stop leaving my things unattended - even well concealed inside a backpack.

I live in a “safe” building in a “safe” neighborhood in an affluent suburb. My building is secured, my neighborhood is well-lit, and I can walk home from the metro at 3 AM and not feel afraid.

Even still, theft happens. Two of my neighbors were robbed this month. Management sent out a memo, reminding residents to use their locks - apparently, both of the burglarized residents failed to use their deadbolts, preferring to leave their doors open.

While it may be convenient to chalk a theft up to the loose moral codes of the individuals involved, isn’t there some measure of common sense that must be employed? In our society, people steal.

Protect your stuff!

It really is just that simple.

Unfortunately, for people like Cathy Salustri, it is easier to just be racist. She seems to have no problem telling her black friends about her newfound racism, openly lamenting her newfound fate, and skillfully avoiding the reality that people get robbed every day. Luckily, Salustri’s friends (as well of the author of the article) quietly call bullshit on her false sense of powerlessness:

A few weeks ago, Salustri told a friend about the article she’d written. Her friend is black, and Salustri told her that if all this had happened before they met, the new Salustri might not have given their relationship a try.

“I don’t like feeling this way, ” she told the woman.

“It’s very simple, ” the friend said.

“Don’t.”

[Side Note: One other thing I noticed in the story was Salustri’s upbringing. Her mother noted “She really didn’t have an idea of black and white… It was never brought up.”

A lack of race consciousness does not translate into an anti-racist world view. Just saying.]

Moving on, I revisited the Assimilated Negro’s posting on Kimberly Klinger’s article about being objectified on a regular basis.

Klinger’s article also upset me, but for a different reason than expected.

The truth is, I totally understand her ugly feelings in response to excessive catcalls. I have them too.

Let me confess to the world that I profile like hell. If I see a group of men between the ages of 18-50 standing on a street corner/against a wall/on park benches/waiting for the bus with no immediate identifiers (metro uniforms/congressional aide badges/school passes) I will cross the fucking street.

Street harassment is a bitch. Unfortunately, men of color tend to do it more than white men. (However, it is also worth noting that men of color are more likely to give up their seats on the subway/metro to pregnant women.)

I’ll go into why street harassment is a horrible experience for women in my second post (check out Catcalling is a Cross Cultural Annoyance).

However, what annoys me about Klinger’s piece isn’t that she attributes her racism to a specific triggering event. What annoys me is that she, like Salustri, openly embraces her racism. The defiant declarations seem almost prideful: No, I didn’t choose this, but I am a racist.

Reading both of their pieces, I was struck by the idea that this may be a new form of privilege - two women who openly proclaimed their racism and benefited from it with exposure, media attention, and a sympathetic ear from other whites. Other whites who have the best of intentions, but damn it, these brown people make it so hard NOT to be racist.

Or maybe I am struggling with my racist thoughts because I am unable to muster up sympathy for white people struggling with their inner racism. Maybe I’m just weary of dealing with people who missed the point of Michael Richards’ rant - it wasn’t about the n-word, it was about the noose and fork reference. Maybe I am tired of listening to white people talk about how much they hate themselves or their past deeds, but ultimately have nothing come from the conversation besides a slight lessening of white guilt.

Or maybe I’m just racist because I generalize white people.

Salustri’s blog continues to document her struggles with the concepts and ideas surrounding race and racism. After reading her blog, I feel like she is trying to work through her issues, but in the wider context of society.

I still think she should have more perspective, but I admire the fact that she is thinking more about the issue of race in society, beyond simply justifying her own experiences.

Klinger’s piece makes a few more points about race, but does not address her core issues - specifically because she admits she does not understand what action to take.

I will concede that overcoming internalized racism is a difficult task, particularly considering that race is such a personal and provocative topic.

Still, I take issue with the fact that one has no control over their own thoughts.

Racist thoughts may enter your mind unbidden - but it is ultimately your responsibility to confront these thoughts, analyze them, reject them , and expel them from your mind. As many times as necessary.

It is your responsibility to shape yourself into the person you want to become. And sometimes, that means confronting yourself, instead of attributing your behavior to the actions of others.

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Catcalling is a Cross Cultural Annoyance at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 29 Jun 2007 at 8:55 am

    […] Please read this post after reading Racism as a Lifestyle Choice. While the two posts are independent, it helps to understand how this post started, and why it is […]

  2. Dead in the Midwest » del.icio.us bookmarks for 07-01-2007 on 03 Jul 2007 at 4:55 pm

    […] Racism as a Lifestyle Choice at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture (tags: race/ethnicity racism culture whiteness class ) […]

  3. Noli Irritare Leones » Blog Archive » Blogwatch on 06 Jul 2007 at 10:24 am

    […] on Racism as a Lifestyle Choice and Catcalling is a Cross-Cultural […]

Comments

  1. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    Yeah what really bothers me about these articles is the suggestion that these events *caused* them to be racist.

    No, you were already racist. Just like the rest of us are. These events merely confirmed the (conscious or subconscious) stereotypes you already held and made it easier for you to justify those thoughts.

    But it is worth discussing how personal experiences shape our worldviews. If you’ve had repeated negative experiences with people of a particular racial/ethnic group, even the most anti-racist person will struggle with not using those experiences to generalize about an entire people.

    Anyone who has worked in nightlife, especially, will know what I mean. I used to hostess at a restaurant and found myself harboring some really, really, negative thoughts against certain groups and honestly, it was a struggle.

  2. Katie wrote:

    Hi there -

    Please, let’s not let all of this fall on Kimberly Klinger. Her piece was only part of a larger City Paper article on street harassment by one Joe Eaton, who had his own racist constructions of what a harasser looks like.

    Here, he talks about problems he has in trying to interview harassers: “Some express, or feign, a failure to speak English.” Now, we’re all aware of the racist characterization of immigrants as deliberately failing to learn English.

    In rehashing a conversation he has with Klinger about the harassment she experiences, he says: “Klinger knows the argument about how catcalling is part of Hispanic culture and how she shouldn’t impose her values on others. She doesn’t want to come off as the silly liberal-arts girl shocked by the big city, but when it happens to her, it grates on her nerves, scares her, makes her feel dirty.” He’s putting the argument out there in her words, but he’s definitely putting it out there.

    He does the same with D. Howard, a black woman who runs a blog called Don’t Be Silent. Here’s what he writes about their conversation: “Howard is black, and it troubles her that the men who come on to her are almost always black as well. She blames that on rappers like Snoop Dog and 50 Cent, the bitches and hos thing. “They don’t learn how to properly treat women,” she says.” He doesn’t take that statement apart either.

    So now we have TWO identifications of street harassers as men of color (either black or Latino), neither one taken apart for the racial sterotypes at its core. This article appeared as the cover story in a free paper that caters mostly to the white population of Northwest DC.

    I think you can make up your own minds here, but I just don’t want Klinger’s piece to be the only part drawing attention.

  3. Keke wrote:

    I used to harbor the same negative feelings about certain groups of people, including the same group that I belong to. As a Black woman, I endured catcalls, harassment and the like from Black men. I used to think all Black men were the same. But for me, I felt I had to confront those thoughts. I started to analyze the men in my own family. My father is a respectable, highly decorated retired police officer. My cousins are either in school or have careers.

    I took it one step further. I visited places outside my comfort zone. I’m a home body but went to festivals, concerts, I went everywhere and broadened my world view. I came away with the understanding that only some Black men behave that way. There are lots of very nice Black men who don’t act that way. Salustri’s problem is that she refuses to broaden her perspective. Perhaps the world she lives in is cloistered and unrelenting. She places people in neat little categories.

    I’ve long stopped doing that. In my experiences, I’ve interacted with good and bad people of all races. So I had to learn to judge people on an individual basis. What other way can you survive? You can stereotype what you feel is a young thug, but get taken for thousands of dollars by a young, clean cut white guy who has “a golden opportunity.” It happens everyday. She needs to open her eyes and see people for the individuals they are.

  4. Brad wrote:

    Ok let me get this straight she became a racist because she lost a damn SCOOTER! My response is so what I was bullied as a kid, there are white people who have been beaten to a pulp. And you don’t see Channon Christian or Christopher Newsom’s (Knoxville Murder victims) family members raging against black people. Absolutely pathetic.

  5. atlasien wrote:

    This the reason I differ with the standard position on antiracist websites… the catchphrase that “we are all racist”. I agree in theory, but my disagreement is really about vocabulary and psychology… Yes, I agree we are all trapped in a system of institutionalized racism. It’s true, but I don’t think it’s very useful. It’s like saying “we’re all human beings”. True. And then what?

    I like to reserve the word “racist” for people and things that clearly suck. It is a word that should have some social shame attached to it. When you tell someone “that’s racist” or “if you say that, you’re a racist” I don’t want them to give me some “oh well we are all racists anyway who cares” answer. It’s impossible to draw a line in the sand and have racism on one side and not-racism on the other, but we should have at least a sense of that dividing line, in order to motivate us away from racism and towards the not-racism.

    Everyone has bad thoughts. As an example, I might see a little kid and think “that kid sure is fat and ugly” but I don’t verbalize that because of social shame. I may even go a step further and interrogate my own thought so I don’t make judgements like that. That’s what racism should be like. It should be shameful. When people talk about their internalized racism they should not be proud of it.

    I believe actions and words are more important than “feelings”. It’s a common pop psychology belief nowadays that people should be free to express their feelings, to be authentic human beings, it doesn’t matter what you express because if you FEEL it, it must be valid… gah. The tone of both those pieces is like “give me a pat on the back for expressing my FEELINGS!” Yes, very nice, you’re expressing your feelings, I’m sure it makes you FEEL better, it also helps to create a more racism-friendly environment in public discourse that non-white people have to live in.

  6. Solange wrote:

    You know this is really upsetting. Without coming off as a racist myself, I am often appalled by the privillage that white women recieve. So she moved into a sub par neighborhood (by her choice) and bad things happened, this happens all the time regardless of color. As an educated black woman of color with two degrees I am often over looked for white women not half as qualified as I am, and I do not cry racism instead I brush it off and move on. This is life. If people of color harbored such negative feelings (which in many cases would be justified) we would be extremely racist. These two women are pathetic. I am so tired of the racist undertone in America it makes me sick to my stomach.

  7. Kai wrote:

    My neighborhood made me kill whitey. ;-P

    atlasian, I haven’t found what you describe to be the “standard position on anti-racist websites”. The anti-racist sites I read are much more nuanced.

    Peace.

  8. atlasien wrote:

    Kai, that’s sort of my point… “we are all racist” is a very nuanced, sophisticated position. I agree with it in theory! However, it is so nuanced that is very hard to communicate to people who are actually acting out racism. It can be reacted to in so many different ways:

    1. I’m a racist, everyone’s racist, so what, it’s an unalterable condition pointless to change.
    2. No, I disagree because I’m not racist, those other people (KKK, etc.) are racist, but I couldn’t be racist!
    3. Yes, I agree, we are all trapped in a system of institutionalized racism

    What really disturbs me is #1. #2 is a typical defensive and somewhat naive reaction. When I read articles like the two references, they strike me as horribly cynical about the prospect of ever ending racism, and they make me think that maybe a less nuanced, RACISM IS ALWAYS REALLY BAD reaction is called for… although the danger in that approach means swinging too far in the direction of #2.

  9. LM wrote:

    Other than the “standard position” line, I co-sign on atlasien’s comment. Well said.

    Funny line, Kai.

    Latoya, I can understand your frustration at reading these pieces on Cathy Salustri and Kimberly Klinger. But I think you miss the mark widely by focusing on what caused her revelation. “…petty property theft… I was expecting a little something more to her story. A dramatic account of sexual assault, prolonged street harassment, an armed robbery… even… a ’stringy headed ho’ insult.”

    Same goes for Brad’s comment #4…

    The problem is making unreasonable generalizations, period. From what I’ve seen, Salustri deserves kudos for exposing herself the way she has.

    Is it unreasonable for her to have been traumatized by petty theft? Judgment call. You may not feel that way, she obviously did, and these different reactions are doubtless informed by experiences and overall knowledge. Is it reasonable for her to “become” racist based on these events? No. She’s finding that out, in part because she went public; my take is that she’s more likely to become a true anti-racist than the next person who feels the same but keeps it to him- or herself.

    I for one hope there isn’t a rash of articles similar to Salustri’s. They tend to raise the temperature to degrees that get in the way of actual progress. But for goodness sake, as far as white privilege goes, this is a pretty good way to have it stripped away. She’s writing about her feelings in an honest — not coded — manner and she’s getting taken to task, rightly, for lazy thinking. Anyone with a similar mindset to hers who’s paying attention can learn, and I hope the only lesson isn’t, “Let me keep my mouth shut.”

  10. atlasien wrote:

    And another thing that infuriates me about those articles, and the way the writers seem to expect pats on the back for their honesty… what if the writers weren’t white? What if they were writing about their internalized racism towards their own race?

    Actually, I think people do this all the time, trying to work through their own deeply painful and shameful internalized stereotypes… and the general public does not consider this newsworthy. There are so many “what’s wrong with black people” pieces written by black people, so many “how come Asians can’t stick together” pieces by Asians and so forth. But when a white person makes the most superficial of criticisms, it’s “honest” and “edgy”.

  11. Kai wrote:

    atlasien, again, I haven’t seen that kind of problem among anti-racists I know, that’s all I’m saying. For whatever reason, I haven’t found what you call “the standard position among anti-racists” to be this kind of “we’re all racist lalala” line you’re describing. Anti-racists I know have no problem confronting overt racists with very straightforward condemnation. But that’s just my experience.

  12. al wrote:

    these women seem to think ‘my personal experience made me racist’ is a new argument, but it’s been fairly standard for at least the last 30 years. michael moore made a good point in one of his books that all the people who had ever really hurt him had been white. i can’t believe that white people have never hurt either of these two women. but a poc does something hurtful and they suddently ‘turn’ racist?

    stuff gets stolen. all the time. especially if you leave it in your yard, in any sort of neighborhood, unless you have like a gate and a guard or something.

  13. Luke Pharma wrote:

    Kai & Altasien(sp?): The danger also becomes thus: attempting to police and/or reward more what people think and feel rather than what they actually do, based simply upon the words that are spoken, not the context of the speaker, situation, etc.

    Such is the effect of diluting, muddying, or spreading the culpability of concepts such as “racism”, the very power for which is built upon a faulty notion of superiority and dominance, no?

    I could buy the “we all hold discriminatory and/or prejudiced views” perspective, and have indeed seen the “supremacy at the expense of others/all” espoused in all colors at various points– but never believe the two should be used with abandon as is too often the case.

  14. Allen wrote:

    Those two articles were bullshit and should have never run in the paper. It’s crazy how often stuff the reinforces stereotypes is given attention, and how things that challenge stereotypes are ignored. And what’s funny is that the lady said her white friend in a black neighborhood had no problems and she did. Yet she attributed her problems to black people instead of herself. Dumbass, if your friend is doing fine with the same black people, why can’t you? Maybe you’re stupid.

  15. atlasien wrote:

    OK, but just to make a final clarification, the “we’re all racist, who cares” reaction is not something I’m ascribing to antiracist blogs in general… it’s a criticism of readers who cannot follow the next logical step from “everyone is entrapped in racism” to “we all have the responsibility to free ourselves from racism”.

    I understand the logic of the tactic, because so many people don’t understand that racism isn’t just men in sheets… it’s trying to hammer the point in their heads. But I think it has some unintended consequences as well. All I want is for the power of saying “that’s racist” to not lose any power to shame.

  16. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    LM -

    Salustri is writing honestly. However, she is also ignoring the obvious facts and contradictions she faces when exploring this topic. Go poke around on her blog a bit, and you will see what I mean. She seems comfortable with revealing herself and racist intents, but not comfortable with finding a solution or resolving the situation.

    Maybe she is growing and learning and coming to terms with her newfound racism. But it wasn’t just that - it was the fact that she took these flimsy pretexts and made them public property, submitted for pulication and part of a public discourse. And still, no sign of her challenging her pretexts.

    Her house is now off the market - that’s because it will not sell (small wonder, right?) She is remaining in her neighborhood. She still cannot find the time to join neighborhood watch. And she still cannot find the answers she seeks, even after speaking to friends, neighbors, journalists, etc.

    I posted a comment on her blog to invite her to the discussion here. Not specifically about her, though I cautioned her I have written an article - but in hopes that she will look at other perspectives and learn, instead of choosing to navel gaze.

    That being said, I stand by my analysis. We all have ugly thoughts inside ourselves stemming from all manner of life experiences- simply acknowledging that they exist isn’t enough. You have to actively want to change.

    I don’t see that in what I’ve read.

    Hopefully, she will take the opportunity to express herself here, or on her own blog.

  17. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    > All I want is for the power of saying “that’s racist” to not lose any power to shame.

    Atlasien, I see what you’re saying, but I think that the shaming power of racism also leads a lot of people into guilt, and paralysis in that guilt. They don’t try and move beyond - and I don’t think that’s very useful to anyone.

  18. LM wrote:

    @ atlasien, #10:

    Yes, non-white people write about and otherwise confront their internalized racism all the time and rarely does it get the kind of play the St. Petersburg story did. Part of the reason it’s not news, for better and worse, is because it happens with more frequency.

    But do Salustri, et al. “seem to expect pats on the back for their honesty”? I don’t know about that. What I do know is that plenty of white people use coded language to justify their more “subtle” brand of racism, and they talk about it mostly with other white people. That isn’t helpful; it perpetuates and reinforces. Salustri is showing her a__. It may not be attractive, but at least she’s not saying “these are my jeans.”

    Compare this to the typical celebrity “misstep-apology” dance, played out and dishonest.

  19. nadia wrote:

    atlasien, i think you are right on with this comment: “I think people do this all the time, trying to work through their own deeply painful and shameful internalized stereotypes… and the general public does not consider this newsworthy.”
    there is definitely that sense that we are supposed to applaud these women for being so honest. honestly, it is not a courageous act to publicly say something that most of dominant society agrees with anyway.

    when i was reading this post, and keke’s comment, i thought about the racism women of color can internalize based on negative interactions with men of color (and the media, socialization, etc). speaking for myself, i internalized a lot about arab men that was unfair and racist. it affected me in an entirely different way than it would a white woman who “became” racist based on being catcalled.

    as far as the danger of the “we are all racists” line, i think it works both ways (as in, people need to hear it so that they stop thinking of racism in such extreme terms, but it can also pacify people into not confronting their own racism because they see it as a natural state). this seems less a critique of anti racist websites and more a critique of the language we use to talk about racism, so i don’t know that saying “it’s not like that on the anti racist sites i read” is entirely applicable here.

  20. LM wrote:

    Latoya,

    I’m not saying that we ought to follow Cathy Salustri’s lead, that she’s got all this stuff figured out. I do appreciate her honesty, but that alone isn’t enough — that’s the fallback trait cited by lots and lots of rude people.

    You mention her “flimsy pretexts and made them public property, submitted for pulication and part of a public discourse.”

    I think these are already out there, unspoken yet visibly supported.

    You say she “seems comfortable with revealing herself and racist intents…”

    What racist intents? I’ll grant that some effects of her “sharing” may be lamentable, but that’s not “intents.” By exposing herself and staying engaged in the conversation, she and anyone as clueless who pays attention will likely end up better, and I think that’s a good thing for all of us.

    “And she still cannot find the answers she seeks, even after speaking to friends, neighbors, journalists, etc.”

    But she’s still looking! (Even as she navel-gazes, yes.) This is a damn miracle, excuse my language.

  21. Latoya Peterson wrote:

    LM -

    Maybe. Maybe not.

    I’m waiting to see something happen. Personally, the impression I get is less than sincere. Maybe you are reading something else in her blogs and her piece.

    And, I hope you are right - one of Salustri’s friends is linked to in a posting discussing how her views have changed, and how they long for a discussion. But discussions are happening (in Salustri’s circle). And still, she clings to these incidents and the hateful reactions. Yes she is exploring those thoughts, talking with her neighborhoods, and coming up against her own roadblocks of experience.

    Check out her blog posting today - I see her neighbors comments, her confusion, and I came to a conclusion. I am waiting to see if Salustri comes to a similar conclusion, or if she goes in a different direction.

    I’ll be keeping up with her blog and her writing to see what develops…

  22. whatever wrote:

    So it is okay for people to have their stuff stolen because it was in their yard not locked up. Great standards there. That is the way we improve relations, we excuse bad behavior. It is okay to steal.

  23. Oranguteena wrote:

    I for one am not impressed by Salustri’s admission. I don’t know if she’s expecting a pat on the back, but there is something about our culture that says if you express a feeling more or less honestly, you’ve done a courageous and virtuous thing, and nothing more can be asked of you. It does seem a little disingenuous.

    I also thought that this line from the St. Pete’s Times was revealing: “How can someone so seemingly oblivious to color now view everything through the lens of race?” This assertion that the race-issue-ignorance of her youth somehow contradicts strong adult racism is interesting. Does a white, “race-neutral” upbringing make for an easy transition into an aware adulthood? I would think not, unless you’re transitioning to an adulthood in which race doesn’t matter - clearly not the case here.

    It is also very disappointing to me that she uses what amounts to the theft of a few little things as a rationale for such foul utterances as “f—— lowlifes”. (It crosses my mind that she may be amping up her racist sentiments as a kind of self-flagellation, but there’s no reason to assume.) While I get that it’s really annoying to have people take your stuff, she is connecting these minor losses spuriously with, well, something that actually matters. The article reads: “‘I don’t want to live somewhere where everything gets stolen,’ Salustri said. ‘I don’t want to work that hard to feel safe.’” It seems like she’s connecting the safety of her property with the safety of herself, and if that leads her to feel comfortable expressing her hate for black people in general, she’s probably got other stuff going on.

    However, I would like to note that in her blog she states that the lock to her yard gate was broken off with a cinder block (in the post “I Had A Dream”). While it may be American materialism more than anything informing her fears, on the other hand I think it’s well-evidenced in the comments about catcalling that women are pretty protective of our bodies. I think that many of us might see a quiet threat in a broken lock, so maybe her worries aren’t quite as frivolous as it seems from the SPT article.

    Of course, there’s still the question of her racism and whether or not she’s actually confronting it (or just indulging in all kinds of unproductive white guilt/rationalization). Maybe there’s even some of that fear of the legendary black male predatory sexuality lurking somewhere in her fears - not anything she brought up in the bits of her blog I read.

  24. Tom wrote:

    Solange:

    As an educated black woman of color with two degrees I am often over looked for white women not half as qualified as I am, and I do not cry racism instead I brush it off and move on. This is life.

    Solange,
    I’m glad to hear somebody say that. How much gets stolen from one underpaid, overqualified person by her overpaid, underqualified colleagues in a year? A lot more than a weed trimmer or whatever. But somehow systematic resume inflation and out-of-control office politics are somehow never seen as the problem that petty theft is.

  25. eric daniels wrote:

    Lysonside I read your post at creative loafing, when you say it’s wrong for me to want to defend myself against white americans when it was 10 white cops who pulled their guns on me three weeks ago. I am supposed to forget that and still be a open-minded black male that’s not reality. All I am saying to those cops and white america in general is….“If you step to me in any way that I deem a threat against my life or person I will defend myself .

    That’s how I deal with enemies of law- abiding black people like myself and others not trying to appeal to the majority’s sense of right and wrong this is not Anne Frank. White Americans and others in this country can fear black men and it’s justified but when I say I fear white people as a whole because of my dealings with American Society it gets dismissed as racism and I am being told to ‘toughen up” because of rappers, absent black fathers and black criminals.

    Sorry Lyonside having guns pulled on me for no reason by white cops for the second time in 20 years will make you a little gun-shy about whites in this country, and if Gulliani gets elected President I will seek every gun permit in Florida to defend myself against white conservative tryanny because I see my life has no value in this society either from thugs of all colors of white people in general that’s not hatred Lyonside that’s intelligence.

  26. Anon wrote:

    Have you seen this?

    “A company that provides translation services and cultural sensitivity training to other organizations is being accused of sex discrimination and racial insensitivity in its own ranks.”

    “To bolster her discrimination complaint with the state, Kelly included photos allegedly showing the company’s top two human resources executives dressed up for the 2005 corporate Halloween party as a black pimp and a white prostitute. The “pimp,” a white woman wearing blackface and sporting a fake gold tooth, won the prize for best costume, the complaint said.”

    http://ads.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8PMRCTO0.htm

  27. Atena wrote:

    To Atlasian (& Carmen):
    I agree with Carmen - the shame and stigma attached to the idea of ‘being a racist’ is doing far more harm than good. I’ve said it again and again - no one wants to admit to being a racist if that means admitting that they suck, and jumping into a vat of shame. Who would volunteer for that? What is their incentive?

    And yet we expect people to own up to their own racism and work on deconstructing it. Shame is not a tool of progress. It just doesn’t work. Shame causes people to clam up, avert their eyes and never bring it up again.

    I struggle with this too, because my first impulse is to make sure the offending party feels as bad as I do. But in the end, will that teach them not to be racist, or will it just teach them to not get caught behaving in racist ways?

    I agree that people should have an internal mechanism that keeps them from perpetrating racist behavior. It’d be better if we could lessen racism, instead of just covering it up.

    Atena

  28. merq wrote:

    ” i can’t believe that white people have never hurt either of these two women. but a poc does something hurtful and they suddently ‘turn’ racist”

    THANK YOU! I hate to point fingers, but even our very own Brad has often told tales of how he could totally be racist for the suffering he experienced at the hands of black people as a teen, almost like he wanted a cookie for it.

    All of these point to that one enduring fact: white people are people, while non-whites merely exist as proof of/exceptions to some “rule.” The number of indignities many of us (including whites) have suffered (personally, professionally, etc) at the hands of white people somehow rarely form a pattern in our minds. Yet, Heaven forbid two black people cut in line at the grocery store — “fucking lowlifes!”

    LM:

    “But do Salustri, et al. “seem to expect pats on the back for their honesty”? I don’t know about that.”

    I don’t know… I’ve seen this happen too many times, and the parties involved sure seem to want to hear how “brave” they are.

    I remember one case on a discussion board I used to frequent. This girl came on, crying about how terrible she felt for cursing out this black guy at a movie theater who wouldn’t move down a seat or two down the row, so she and her friend could sit together. He cursed her out, and her exact words (as she recalled them, at least) were

    “It’s not the color of your skin that makes you a nigger…”

    Typical metropolitan pussyfoot racism, right? At least, Jim Crow racists had the courage of their convictions.

    She then tries these two standard approaches:
    1. Telling how her friend, “who is black” cursed him out when she heard about it, and gave her a high five!
    2. Telling how awful she now feels… but he was so mean! Am I a bad person?

    As pathetic as that was, what really disturbed me was the outpouring of validation and sympathy (!!) she got from posters on there. I shudder just remembering it.

  29. S wrote:

    LaToya - I know you were being sincere, but parts of your posts are waaay too funny! Of course, I know it’s a serious matter, and I’ll read the whole post later. For now, I am cracking up on your “Oops, I did it again” comments. Yeah, we all have accidentally become ______ (insert bad character here)
    I accidentally stole some gum when I was litte. It kept being there, and I kept being unsupervised, and it keep looking good, and I kept wanting it because of all the Hubba Bubba commercials and it just happened because of the enviroment that I was in. LOL!

  30. S wrote:

    I know I might BRIEFLY sound as if I’m playing Devils Advocate, but at least the ladies in the articles are ADMITTING that they have a problem. Like someone mentioned above, this whole “justification” thing isn’t new. Many black men CONSTANTLY name black women as their #1 reason for dating white women. They write off ALL black women just because of their experiences with some of the black women around them, but they WOULDN’T DARE write off all white women, even though MANY black men have encountered racist white women throughout their lifetime and still do. The reverse: Four black guys walk in a room with white wives and a number of black women diagnose them with self-hatred but wouldn’t blink at a white man with an Asian wife. And Middle Eastern Muslims? Our country is attacked and immediately ALL Middle Eastern and racially ambiguous brown men with turbans who don’t speak much English are profiled by every race of people in America. They can’t even buy fireworks for the 4th of July without suspicion! What about bullied, loner white boys? We didn’t profile every little white boy we saw after all those school shootings, oh, but now, many people are on the look-out for lonely, odd asian boys and young men who might attempt to initiate the next Virginia Tech massacre!

    This happens all the time, and though I do admire when a person can admit they have a problem, I must agree, that THIS kind of justification usually does result in less white guilt. You admitt that you have a problem, then immediately blame it on your recent thefts in your black neighborhood? Hey, my bike was stolen in a black neighborhood…by Mexicans. Oh, and a white girl set me up so I would get in trouble. A black girl called me jealous of her light skin, several black guys have called me bitch, white guys call me fat, and all the babies that I hold slobber on me. I suppose I should call my local newspaper and tell them my story of why I am, um, racist, and sexist, and skin-ist, and I don’t like babies…you know…because of my experiences.
    As usual, good, thought-provoking post, Latoya. Looking forward to reading the Catcalls.

  31. Plantsman1 wrote:

    whatever wrote:

    “So it is okay for people to have their stuff stolen because it was in their yard not locked up. Great standards there. That is the way we improve relations, we excuse bad behavior. It is okay to steal.

    Posted 29 Jun 2007 at 5:01 pm ¶ ”
    ——————————————————

    That’s pretty much an example of the standard rejoinder, isn’t it? It doesn’t matter that no one even implied that.

  32. squidfly wrote:

    We are not born racists, we have racsim thrust upon us-

    Soweto Kids 1966.

  33. WomunOfColour wrote:

    I find the second paragraph of the Salustri article absurd: “I’m a white woman living in a black neighborhood, and I’m turning into a racist because of it.” However, when I read the article, it didn’t seem like she was asking for sympathy or expecting to be congratulated for not even doing the minimum (overcoming her own racism). I think it’s good that she’s honest with herself, but obviously, she’s still racist.

    The main problem I have is with commenters and supporters trying to reassure her that she’s “not racist” and congratulating her. No, being admitting your own racism isn’t enough, doesn’t in itself make you a better person. You have to change, something that is a process and is never finished. Even a person who is overcoming racism shouldn’t be congratulated. Overcoming racism and other forms of discrimination is the bare minimum, what everyone should be doing, not something to be considered ‘extra’.

  34. Luke Pharma wrote:

    Latoya,

    No. I do not sense that she is seeking reward or approval for her admissions.

    Yes, I sense conflict within a person whose personal experience does not echo my own, but whose issues are no less significant for being aired. Was there indeed a prescribed public process and timetable that anyone should follow while they sort out their mess? Thirty days should be adequate then?

    No, explanation cannot pass for justification (and vice versa), and justification should not pass for intention. We hear what she feels. We hear, through her filter, disparate fragments that *may* have legitimately informed her views. We *do not* know why she *really* is airing all this in public, at this time in particular, in this fashion, on her own, and what she hopes to gain (or not).

    Yes, her actions (or lack of agenda) annoy, frustrate, anger, etc. because this is not how one is supposed to combat racism. If there’s not even agreement that her speech merits the level of such a label, why the rush to stage an intervention? If there’s such doubt, why even attempt outreach that’s only fueled by cynicism?

    Her actions, thoughts, and posts make her more of a cipher prone to self-flagellation, angst, narcissism, guilt, fear, anger, despair, uncertainty, ennui, detachment and any number of things bred in the hearts and minds of many, but not all, urban Gen Xers (race/class regardless). What they actually do with it all– another matter.

  35. Bianca Reagan wrote:

    I liked your post, and I linked to it on my blog: “Semantics”: Yet another lesson from a person of a certain privileged class.

  36. Latina Viva wrote:

    Well, I’ve wrote a post about this, trying to add a little - thanks Latoya for reading it. I did sent a trackback, but Movable Type sometimes eat my trackbacks! :) So, here’s the link: Involuntary, Justified Racism Is The New Black.

    Now, about Salustri’s “honesty” and such: for me, it doesn’t mean anything, whether she’s looking for a “pat on the back” or not. The fact that she “came clean” shouldn’t be taken into account, at all. Forgive me, but I think it’s ridiculous even to mention it.

    If she (or some guy) were saying “I was a nice person, but I’m turning into a stalker/sex offender/serial killer because of my neighbors”, NOBODY will think “at least this lady is admitting that she has a problem.” Everyone would say to this lady to GET SOME HELP! Why does everybody seems to think racism is a minor problem?

    If David Ritcheson (the kid who survived a brutal racially motivated attack last year, do you remember?) were still alive (he died today after jumping from a Carnival cruise ship, and it’s still unclear whether David’s death was a suicide or an accident)… If David were still alive, you could ask him if he thought a racist is less dangerous than a sex offender or a serial killer. What do you think he would say?

  37. LM wrote:

    Latina Viva,

    I agree with the thrust of your comment. That said, with Salustri (and not necessarily with other cited examples), the meta message I get is, “I need help.”

    It’s not, “Wow, this racially stratified society is correctly structured.” It’s not, “Why didn’t I learn to hate when I was younger; I would have saved so much time.” It’s not, “Look at heroic me.” (Well, maybe a bit of the last one… but I’d argue that our media culture loves to celebrate the rise of the lowest of the low… it’s way predictable. I suspect that Salustri and anyone else with a shred of awareness about the media knows that’s a common arc, and just ’cause you know what’s coming doesn’t mean you’re looking for it in the first place.)

    Again, I’m not for her sainthood and she certainly isn’t the premier sociological thinker of this or any day. But she could have expressed all of her ill feeling over and over in coded language that never mentioned race and been seen by many of us as the “typical” non-overt racist, damn near impossible to change. Instead she’s laying herself and her half-baked ideas/feelings bare and saying herself that something’s wrong with her.

    It’s important that we change things structurally, but Salustri and other individuals are part of the structure. I have no idea what will become of her, but I think there’s a better chance now that she’s “outed” herself for her to be helpful in weakening that structure. And if not? Well, at least we know where the hell she stands.

  38. Anonymous wrote:

    Yeah, that’s right people, it’s this woman’s fault that she was the victim of petty theft.

    My impression of this woman’s story is that she came to the disturbing realization that stereotypes actually derive from people’s real life experiences, even long past or imperfectly remembered or taken out of context. This woman’s real experience is that her property was stolen, after she moved into a predominantly black neighbourhood, after she had convinced herself that stereotypes of black people as vandals and thieves were entirely baseless and untrue. Then, suddenly, she finds underpriveleged people who have been marginalized by society waltzing off with her possessions, which she had never previously had to guard or secure.

    Does this make her naive? Perhaps. Did her disillusionment produce too extreme a reaction? Perhaps. But there is, was, a nobility in her naivete.

    How is it that her failure to padlock her doors and string razor wire around her front lawn can be mocked and derided as a lack of “common sense,” when to say the same of a woman who leaves a nightclub dressed as a prostitute and suffers for it by being sexually assaulted would be thought reprehensible? The misjudgement of the victim does not in any way absolve the moral responsibility of the trespasser! Rapists are SCUM. Thieves are SCUM, whatever colour they may be. The people who STOLE from her are indeed “lowlifes.” And in addition to a shed and a padlock, I would suggest Ms. Salustri buy a gun.

  39. Eun-jung wrote:

    Hey LaToya - I found an interesting article for you … wasn’t sure if you had found it yet or not…

    I am not sure if I feel that I believe this or not but it’s an article saying that women who face racial discrimination are more likely to develop breast cancer.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070705/hl_nm/racial_discrimination_dc

  40. michelle wrote:

    I went to a predominately white university. In order to get around, most of us had a bike. When we first got to school, part of freshman orientation was about how important it was to have a bike and how important it was to lock up your bike. Now, I knew people who, for whatever reason, didn’t lock their bikes and those bikes got stolen. Was it wrong, yes. Did anybody ever feel a whole lot of sympathy or outrage, no. Should we have been outraged, perhaps. Were we jaded and calloused, perhaps. I will tell you, however, no one ever equated an unlocked bike getting stolen with a young woman being raped, no matter how she was dressed or what she did or did not do. Yes, I am in the “lock your scooter up and maybe your neighbors wouldn’t steal your stuff” camp.

    I like the posts that asks the question, in light of the afore mentioned opinion, was her racism always there, lingering under the surface? You know, every other generation of black people (and I single out that particular part of America because she singles Blacks out in her article) in America has had tremendous obstacles to overcome. And there is power in the immediacy of having a very clear enemy. The target was clear, the stakes were clear. Jim Crow, the Klan, Plessy v Ferguson. All of our enemies has faces and names.

    Now, not so much. Who are the “evil doers” now? Who do we fight against and without a clear cut enemy of the people, how do we structure our fight? Has this woman (probably unwittingly) given voice to what the next step is in fighting racism? Is the enemy in the aftermath? Most of us in America has a grandparent that stood on one side or the other and then passed those ideas down to their children and now to us. But could the next step be that White people, brown people, black people and red people have to give voice to the ghosts of the past so that we can excersize those demons?

    I read her post dated June 28, 2007 and to paraphrase, she is very frightened that some of the people who agreed with her and welcomed them into their communities, were neo-Nazi, White sumpremacist hate groups. She says “I would rather live in Bartlett Park, with its crime, drugs, and litter, than spend one moment more having Nazi supremacists sympathize with me….I’ll take where I am over where “they” are anyday. How horrible it must be to be inside their heads.” But to me, NOW WE ARE GETTING SOMEWHERE!!!! There isn’t that big of a leap from her “Black people stole my scooter, now I am a racist” thinking to the answer to the question of how Black people could have been terrorized by the Klan for so many years or how the Nazis were able to drag off Jews, gypsies and homosexuals to the death camps. I think it is in the minds of basically good people where racist, sexist, xenophobic thoughts live unchecked where violence is actually born. Good people have to be able to voice those opinions so they don’t become their “truth”.

    LM, I have to agree with you (I hope you are finding that funny, and I mean that good naturedly). Whatever her reasons are and whatever becomes of her, she might have just stumbled upon something that can give us a tool in “weakening the structure”.

  41. LM wrote:

    michelle,

    It’s OK if we agree every once in a while, right? :-)

  42. michelle wrote:

    Every once in a while is cool, LM!

    ;)

  43. Anonymous wrote:

    Try living in a city (Philadelphia in this case) which is overrun by kids (and a fair number of adults as well) from the ghetto with that thug mentality and see if you don’t start learning to be a little averse to African-Americans. If I was so racist before I moved into the city, I could easily have stayed in the overwhelmingly white suburbs I moved from.

  44. michelle wrote:

    Sorry Anonymous….

    I have lived in many cities that are “overrun” (interesting choice in words…isn’t that the term that people use when speaking about a rodent problem?) by people from the “ghetto with that thug” mentality and I am not adverse to African Americans.

    I have experience heinous behaivor by people of all races. I have lived in the south and midwest where there are many white people with a “redneck” mentality and I am not adverse to white people.

    I think I am adverse to people who insist on reveling in their own ignorance, poverty and lack of education.

  45. Megan wrote:

    I really enjoyed your thoughts on on the articles and agreed with your arguments. I do enjoy when people try to look at themselves objectively to examine why they feel a certain way about things.

    Racism is the result of one our oldest primal survival techniques. fear is a defense mechanism that aids in our fighting or are felling. one reaction was to be cautious of anything different cause “what you don’t know can kill you”. When we started living in groups it made coping easier, enhancing our means of survival. then we started to create ideologies from the groups still holding on to our “anything different= bad” shit. and god forbid they do it different than how we do it. god forbid we even have to pose a question as to why they do things the way they do things because it may cause us to question why we do the things we do.

    Fear is why racism exists and it is only when the individual stands outside them selves and can honestly answers the questions of why we do what we do can we better understand how to make the world a better place over all.

  46. Rafael wrote:

    Speaking of scumbags…

    Here are the photos of the blackface pimp costume mentioned above from the corporate party:

    #2 HR rep Valerie Higgins dressed in blackface as a ‘pimp’
    #1 HR rep Janice Parvin dressed as a ‘ho’
    CEO George Ulmer (dressed as Satan)

    Notice how both the CEO Ulmer and #1 HR rep Parvin are applauding and smiling at the racist blackface pimp costume.

    http://tinyurl.com/32qdfb
    http://tinyurl.com/37ejj8
    http://tinyurl.com/34bfgl
    http://tinyurl.com/3ca2du
    http://tinyurl.com/2o88sx

    Parvin is an elected official. Her identity can be verified from this photo:
    http://www.mpacorn.com/News/2003/1030/Front_Page/

    Ulmer’s photo can also be verified online:
    http://www.hsdo.net/about.htm

  47. ron smith wrote:

    These are timely comments these days. I happened upon this blog for a different reason and ended up being edified about things I never knew.
    But it does bring up a question that is near to my reason for being here.
    Why do subliminal racist (those who are but can’t overtly admit) use the philosophy that nobody is colorblind and everyone is racist to some degree? It fuels a lot of philosophical debates but stems actually from racist who feel a need to show how “everybody is a racist therefore my being one is not THAT big a deal”.
    This kind of radio talk show philosophy is a healing mechanism for many whites. Especially far left neo cons.

    I wish I could find a good essay or book that addresses this and givesit a name. It needs a name… a monker.

  48. Tree wrote:

    Exactly. That much applauded broadway musical ‘Avenue Q’ does nothing but perpetuate stereotypes and yet it’s reviewed as groundbreaking.
    I am proud to hate ‘Everyone is a Little Racist’.
    About the racism–belittling the task of those who must face racism every day among the public to various degrees is too commonplace. However, a story about this kind of racism on a weblog would receive far more horrible than constructive comments.
    It’s good that this woman has come to terms with subconscious racism that her naivete all these years has masked.
    For instance, I know a white woman (a relative) who was evasive of interacting with people of mixed descent that she learned from the equally evasive patterns of behavior of her mother. Neither considered themselves racists.
    When the white woman actually started meeting people of other ethnicities and having black friends, she was tempered with a sudden uncertainty and fear.
    Once, she used a derogatory term to refer to a man who passed her during a traffic jam caused by a funeral. She later confided in me in tears, because she had these friends and she didn’t want to think that way of them.
    I told her the same thing Miss Salustri’s friend told her, because that’s the way we are supposed to govern our feelings, isn’t it? We complain about those who lack self control–are we supposed to coddle them when they’re racist?
    Miss Salustri must fight her own battle if she intends to grow as a human being. If she is willing to combat these thoughts, she has a possibility for considerable growth.
    Coming to grips with this publically might have been a way to force herself to come to grips with this–in essence shame herself into constructive analysis of the illogical institution of thought that racism is.
    Then again, it might have been a newspaper’s intent to impugn all poor, urban blacks as criminals, as always. (A belief held by some of my black friends that belies a fellow student I knew in school who was intelligent, talented, and and quiet–and came from the poorest, most crime-ridden section of my home city.)
    Simply put–it is always racist to classify and condemn–everyone might (allegedly) do this, but does that mean it passes ethically?
    The answer is no. It’s hard to believe that people believe that one bad experience can set the tone for all experience.
    Hers is a dangerous article only because people who have avoided people of other cultures now have their justification, even if she herself is struggling with it.
    (Yeah, I tend to contradict myself.)

  49. Tree wrote:

    Yikes–my friend in school was very intelligent and talented, but had my friends met him, they would have pegged him for a criminal.
    Sorry, that was a very poorly worded paragraph.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.