No homo… black male intimacy

by guest contributor Dumi Lewis, originally published at Black At Michigan

So for the past few years nearly every time I hear Black men nearing a point of emotional intimacy two words quickly have haunted the moment, “no homo.” Picture this Sicily… err, I mean, so picture this, you’ve mentored a brother for the past 5 years, talked him through some major life issues: college, divorce, depression, women, etc. and he’s about to take off for a far off land. He takes a moment to express his thanks for the love that you’ve showed him over the years and how you’ve improved his life and he punctuates his statement with “no homo.” Not only has it happened once, but it’s happened multiple times with the brothas that I’ve worked with. But the reason it urks me so much, is that so many of these brothas are the “good brothas”, the brothas who have attempted to push on issues of gender, inequality at large and sexuality… well maybe not so much the latter.

The “no homo” movement seems to have grown directly out of Hip-Hop’s obsession with hyper-masculinity. As Hip-Hop has pushed the masculine through performance of actions, be they violent or non-violent, the realm of intragender intimacy has consistently been silent. Now of course there are songs for my crew, my niggas, even back in the day my posse, but these songs fall far from carving out a space to discuss close relationships between Black men (except when the subject of the song is dead, then you can talk freely). But this is nothing new to our community, as Black men at large, and those embedded within the Hip-Hop generation.

Now to be clear, I don’t think Black men lack intimacy, I think we simply truncate it for the “sexuality safety.” To me sexuality safety is about the maintenance of an image of heterosexuality (meaning: I’m a guy, I mess with women); and a by extension a vehement rejection of homosexuality (meaning: I’m a guy, I’m not for that gay shit). They are two sides of the same coin in our music. While some are already chomping at the bit to say, not all of Hip-Hop is like this, let me take this moment to pre-emptively strike like GWB and douse some of your righteous indignation and remind you that many of our favorite rappers follow this logic. Nas, Common, Andre 3000, the list goes on. Just search through their catalogs, it’s there!

Hip-Hop’s response has been to dodge or turn a blind eye to homoeroticism, but sometimes it comes full frontal. While rumors about rappers being homosexual have long directed Hip-Hop (check out Marc Lamont Hill’s forthcoming book on more of this). In recent months, rumors have become specters. The Lil’ Wayne and Baby kiss started a firestorm, that I hoped would have lead to a different discussion of male intimacy, but lord knows that fire burned out as quickly as it went ablaze, leaving most people with the same ideas of equating black male intimacy with sexuality. In recent days T-Pain has gained significant attention regarding his comments about Ray J’s sex tape and endowment. After making multiple comments about penis size he attempts to absolve himself of homoerotic overtones by saying “no homo.” See, no harm, no foul. No way in hell. Most folks who read his comments and reacted offered up their own theories of the boundaries of masculinity and appropriate references to another man’s physique. The bottom line that could be taken from most comments that I could stomach was “a real man never even notices another man’s penis”, sure, right.

While the popular attention that Wayne and T-Pain garnered is important, it tells us little about how Black folks, and Black men in particular, understand the boundaries between intimacy and sexuality. I’m most concerned with the use of “no homo” when it comes to interpersonal intimacy. I know that we as Black men have historically bottled emotion, but punctuating our sharing with “no homo” is troubling. By using “no homo” are brothas saying the only men who share emotions are homosexual? Are brothas saying that sharing emotions will immediately lead to some form of sexual encounter? And more importantly, to myself I’ve asked and am asking, do I create an environment with my brothas where they think I’m so anti-gay that they need to qualify their emotions and distinguish them from sexuality?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Links for Week 5 « Sociology of Women on 12 Jun 2007 at 4:12 am

    [...] No-Homo, an article talking about the shaky ground between intimacy and sexuality in hip-hop. [...]

  2. Black male hurt at Racialicious - the intersection of race and pop culture on 24 Sep 2007 at 7:01 am

    [...] to fall down or how to seek intimacy or guidance from other black men without having to say “no homo” every time we want to express our love for one [...]

Comments

  1. brad wrote:

    “Black folks.” Can we not make blanket statements about all “black folks”? I think the author means “Black Americans” or “African-Americans” and a subculture therein.

  2. Malena wrote:

    I agree. I enjoy this polemic especially because hip hop’s straight hetero-fronting is getting out of hand. I do wonder though to what extent we’re willing to pathologize commercial rap culture before that also gets out of hand…

  3. dnA wrote:

    The fact that the phrase “No-Homo” even exists is ample evidence of the rampant homo-eroticism in Hip-hop. Hip-hop is basically a fraternity at this point, so homoeroticism is inevitable.

    A commenter on XXL once said something like “when you think about it, jumping around a stage with your shirt off talking about how you’d die for your homies is kind of gay”.

  4. Anu wrote:

    I’ve definitely noticed the “no homo” thing. I’m a freshman at college and on facebook I notice it ALL time, sometimes even from girls.

    “no homo man but I like your shirt, where u get it at?”

    “lol man ur so funny I luv you no homo”

    “we gotta hang out sometime no homo”

  5. s wrote:

    I know some black guys that have nothing going for themselves except for what they think are positive stereotypes concerning their masculinity. Take that away and they have nothing. I’m not suprised that many black men act this way. But it seriously makes them look just as bad as racists: BOTH are so busy bashing that they can’t just go with the flow, mind their own business, and respect people for who they are.

  6. bertie wrote:

    I wonder how much the use of “no homo” is yet another reflection of black male pathology or is it just a popular catch phrase started by rappers and mimiced and (over) used by folks in between a certain age and in certain settings without any thought or real concern that their words will actually be perceived as outing their inner-gay.

  7. Anonymous wrote:

    You’d think after suffering through centuries of racism, black Americans would reject bigoty, yet they themselves are among the most bigoted group of Americans. This No Homo thing is absurd, it’s like a white guy saying I like Hip-Hop but “No N—A!”

  8. A. wrote:

    I’d just like to say how hideous I think the phrase “No homo” is. I actually only started hearing it in frequent use these past few months– I didn’t even know this phrase existed until recently.

    It’s also oddly an almost homoerotic thing to say. First of all, its automatically “qualifiying” something you’ve just said as “not gay” without first being prompted to. It’s like you already know what you’ll say MIGHT be construed as gay, so you have to make sure people know its not. Which says a lot about your mindset and the mindset of the people around you, that everyone would be so freaking hypersensitive and preoccupied with “gayness” that you’d have to make sure to “excuse” yourself right from the get-go– just in case!

    That’s really very closet-gay.

    Its almost humorous in its sad irony.

  9. Gandalf Mantooth wrote:

    It’s all BOL’s fault.

  10. FrancesM wrote:

    Is it possible the no-homo thing came from so many dudes being on the “down low” with their friends? Just a thought.
    ~F

  11. Anu wrote:

    I’ve also only started hearing the phrase in the last few months as well. I think “A” and Bertie make good points and could be simultaneously right.

  12. merq wrote:

    1. I think I agree with Bertie on this one.

    2. Please let’s not start this “down low” mess in here.

    3. In a similar vein, please let’s not give a certain inflammatory blogger any shine here… notice I didn’t even mention his name.

    4. While I agree certain elements are simple examples of mimicry, we’ve gotta recognize the vicious cycle here. Just as with the “gender war” theory (or any internalized stereotype, for that matter), there is the (stereotypical) stimulus, the adoption of the stereotype as fact, and the perpetuation of the said stereotype by the subject.

    A good population of African American men in this generation suffer this to a great degree. I will even go as far as to include non-AA black men scattered across a globe enveloped in the cultural imperialism of American pop culture.

    By the time I approached my tween years and began (like all kids) asserting some right to dress self, I already knew what styles I was supposed to adopt as a young black man. Never mind the fact that I was a young, Nigerian black man.

    We don’t even think about the ubiquity of the “black male” schema until we find something that doesn’t fit into it. The stereotypical Black Male schema is a paradox in terms of scope — it’s wide enough to govern everything from your walk to your code of ethics, yet it’s so constricting, it tries to limit men’s outward expression to a mere handful of options.

    I’ll never forget reading an interview with the once-ingenious Wu-Tang Clan producer, the RZA, discussing the work he did on the score of the first “Kill Bill” movie. He recalled how proud he was on the day of its premiere, and proceded to preface his next statement with the line:

    “I’m from the hood, so I don’t smile too much, but I was just so…”

    And all I could think at that point was “how narrow is this “black man” box getting, that we now have to explain ourselves when cameras catch us smiling?

    I never tire of engaging strangers in conversation when they give me the weird “why is he dressed like that” look on the train. No, my hair isn’t green, and I’m not in women’s lingerie (I don’t wear that on weekdays. heh). Rather, I’m just a tall, black man in relaxed boot-cut jeans, a button-down shirt, and sandals. Scandalous, eh?

    I ask them what my clothing seems to say about me, and the most common reply is “he’s probably gay.” Then I state that while I see no greater harm in being mistaken for a gay man than for a Ghanaian, I must ask them if they got that vibe off the 200 non-black dudes they saw dressed the same way that morning. The result is usually either a moment of quiet, reluctant realization, or a bullshit “well, they’re all gay anyway” response. Either way, my work there is done.

    …or I just remind them how ubiquitous the color pink became after Cam’Ron basically said it was “okay” to be seen in it.

  13. FrancesM wrote:

    Merq-
    Why not talk about the down low aspect? I think my opinion has value here. As a queer woman in the AA community I’ve seen some of my guy friends struggle with the sexuality vs. masculinity issue. I’ve known DL guys who have disclosed to me only what was really going on. I do think it’s possible that the no-homo thing may also stem from the gay sex going on among our own & I think it’s high time to deal with the homophobia that is to a large degree entrenched in hyper masculinity in not just our, but every community.
    Peace!
    ~F

  14. bertie wrote:

    >FrancesM–the DL hysteria has probably fed into the original popularityof the “no homo” movement amongst young straight men. I mean if Merq wearing sandals with jeans relegates him to the “hmmmm…he looks suspect” category, lawd knows what expressing male to male emotional intimacy will do.

    >Merq–funny you mention the sandals thing. I had a fairly recent conversation with a younger cousin about wether black men should wear sandals. (The answer is no according to youngsters–timbs or sneakers only, even at the beach). He took issue with my “whiteboy” fashion sense of flip-flops and jeans. But apparently, according to my cousin, this strict dress code does not apply to west indian or african men (whom he lumps together as “island folks”–please note that not all my family members are like this.) So you’d get a pass– at least down south.

  15. LM wrote:

    @ merq: Brilliant! (No Guinness beer.)

    Seriously, great points, especially on the narrow schema that many in society expect of black men, including some black men themselves.

    I’d not dismiss the DL issue outright, but I think it’s been way overblown. Men have had gay sex while living “straight” lives for centuries on end. I’m sure some guys today who utter the phrase “no homo” and are gay would have been uttering the occasional “f__got” 20 years ago.

    All the overblown coverage of the so-called DL phenomenon has brought speculation on gayness to the fore relative to the past (same as general discussion of sex, as evidenced by the gradual mainstreaming of porn). It’s not that this didn’t happen before, just that it wasn’t usually as explicitly put in public.

    As an evolution of language (and mind you, I’m not suggesting that the “other f-word” has been completely replaced), I think “no homo” is a very clumsy step forward for hetero men who, for the most part, aren’t as deathly afraid of being around gay men as they used to be… as long as there are “boundaries.”

    It’s still problematic and a lil’ bit inane.

    One last thing — to a large extent, the fact that “no homo” is gaining a measure of ubiquity is evidence that guys ARE sharing their feelings with one another. Generally speaking — with plenty of exceptions — that’s not easy for us and never has been.

  16. Fiqah wrote:

    “No homo?” Man. That’s like “nappy headed ho’s” for sexual orientation. Just when I was starting to feel better about the world…

  17. Anonymous wrote:

    I first heard the phrase ‘no homo’ from my neighbors. I don’t even know them or talk to them but they keep throwing that phrase at me whenever I walk by. I wasn’t sure what it meant and I didn’t care to ask, so I google searched it and that’s how I got to this site. From what I understand, ‘no homo’ means ‘I’m not gay’. Now, a real man who is confident in his sexuality will not need to throw phrases around to disspell any gay suspicions. ‘No homo’ is a sign of insecurity and anxiety about one’s orientation and an attempt to hide it in order to be thought of as a socially acceptable heterosexual. So, in my opinion, I feel my neighbors might be ‘on the down low’, not that I really care.