Hear Me Out: Hip-hop and Gender Criticism

by guest contributor dnA, originally published at Too Sense

I used to hate hip-hop… yup, because the women degraded
But Too $hort made me laugh, like a hypocrite I played it
A hypocrite I stated, though I only recited half
Omittin the word “bitch,” cursin I wouldn’t say it
Me and dog couldn’t relate, til a bitch I dated
Forgive my favorite word for hers and hers alike
But I learnt it from a song I heard and sorta liked

-Lupe Fiasco, Hurt Me Soul

This was a long time ago.One of the unique things about Hip-hop is its ability to respond directly to criticism, which has been completely omitted in the ongoing mainstream media assault on Hip-hop culture and music. The root of Hip-hop’s mainstream popularity is its ability to provide to white men, access to a fiction of black masculinity that reinforces their own perceptions of what a man is supposed to be. This in itself is informed by thousands of years of Western Civilization, and is present in all aspects of American culture.

However, unlike other mediums of artistic expression, something which is rarely acknowledged is that rappers regularly adress the problem of misogyny in Hip-hop. Lupe’s verse above is to me, a powerfully simple explanation for the way certain ideas about gender are spread, he simply heard it from a song he sort of liked. But his admission of hypocrisy stands in stark contrast to the rest of American popular entertainment; when was the last time you heard anyone from a major television or film company admit that their product was sexist or misogynist, or in someway perpetuated harmful stereotypes about women?

That said, there is a strong reactionary sentiment among Hip-hop heads. Byron Crawford may be the single most popular Hip-hop columnist on the web, but there is little question that he absolutely hates women. He also apparently hates Muslims, and I will try to stay focused and not adress the absurd right wing talking points he clings to in this column on Lupe. More relevant to this post is that Lupe’s admission that Hip-hop’s depiction of women is harmful, and his criticism of mainstream Hip-hop’s excessive materialism tags him, in Crawford’s eyes, as a “suicide bomber”:

Does Lupe Fiasco consider himself the equivalent of a suicide bomber sent to rid the rap world of a few infidels (metaphorically speaking at least)? When you think about it, his album does seem filled with that kind of rhetoric. He speaks of the images of champagne and bling bling so often projected in hip-hop the same way that Islamic fascists speak of American culture in general and, in particular, the “MTV culture” that they view as such a threat to Muslim youth.

And his claim that he once hated hip-hop because of the way women were treated (presumably before he became a gat-toting crack slinger?) seems ripe for further inspection beyond declaring his views “refreshing.” Muslims, after all, aren’t exactly known for being progressive when it comes to that sort of thing. Does he find that the depiction of women in rap lyrics is especially harsh vis a vis other genres of music or is the thought of a woman in revealing attire alone enough to set him off?

Crawford is regularly clowned by his readers but the sheer number of people who read his column means that on some level, people are absorbing his watered down Limbaugh talking points. (When I say Limbaugh, I’m not speculating; Crawford refers to Louis Farrakhan as “Calypso Louis”, which is a term of Limbaugh’s invention).

But if Crawford wasn’t so bent on hating women for what may be a lifetime of rejection or the result of anger stemming from repressed homosexual tendencies, I won’t speculate further, (again, read the man’s column, he is unable to refer to gay people without using the phrase “teh ghey” and feared that if Imus were fired for referring to women as hoes that god forbid, people might actually stop doing that) he would realize that there is an ongoing discourse about the representation of women in Hip-hop. No one can argue that Jay-Z has been selling more albums for longer than anyone else still rapping, and he certainly took personally accusations of misogyny on Blueprint 2:

They call me this misogynist, but they don’t call me the dude
To take his dollars to give gifts at the projects
These dudes is all politics, depositing checks
they put in they pocket, all you get in return is a lot of lip

Jay’s reasoning is quite weak, but the fact that he feels an obligation to respond is telling, because the century old film industry, more influential in our understanding of gender than Hip-hop will ever be, certainly never has. Of course, that also wasn’t the only time that Jay responded to gender criticism on that album alone either. Jay’s response was the typically binary one of someone who realizes that their understanding of women is sexist, but is trying hard to rationalize:

Sisters get respect, Bitches get what they deserve,
Sisters work hard, Bitches work your nerves,
Sisters hold you down, Bitches hold you up,
Sisters help you progress, Bitches’ll slow you up,
Sisters cook up a meal play they role with the kidz, Bitches in the street with they nose in ya biz,
Sisters tell the truth, Bitches tell lies,
Sisters drive cars, Bitches wanna ride
Sisters give up the ass, Bitches give up the ass
Sisters do it slow, Bitches do it fast
Sisters do they dirt outside of where they live, Bitches have niggas all up in your crib,
Sisters tell you quick you betta check ya homie, Bitches don’t give a fuck they wanna check for ya homie,
Sisters love Jay cause they know how hov is
I LOVE MY SISTERS I DON’T LOVE NO BITCH

Jay-Z’s response to criticisms of misogyny is well, misogynist, as it casts women as being either/or, an unfortunate parallel to the “good nigger/bad nigger” language once used explicitly in media and entertainment. On his next effort, the Black Album, Jay’s attempt to respond to gender criticism is in my opinion, deceptively subtle and underrated, but at the same time doomed to failure.

In the discourse about the word nigger, Hip-hop heads especially have tended to argue that there’s a difference between “nigga” and “nigger”. I’m not going to argue that except to say that you can never fully sever “nigga” from “nigger”, even if you were to believe they were different words. So it stands to reason that Jay-Z’s attempt to change the meaning of the term bitch from gendered to gender neutral on 99 Problems is a failure. In the song, Jay uses the term “bitch” to refer to critics, a dog, and a male coward, but never to women, excepting the implied use in the hook.

Rap critics that say he’s “Money Cash Hoes”
I’m from the hood stupid what type of facts are those
If you grew up with holes in your zapitos
You’d celebrate the minute you was havin doe
I’m like fuck critics you can kiss my whole asshole
If you don’t like my lyrics you can press fast forward
Got beef with radio if i don’t play they show
They don’t play my hits well i don’t give a shit SO
Rap mags try and use my black ass
So advertisers can give em more cash for ads…fuckers
I don’t know what you take me as
or understand the intellegence that Jay-Z has
I’m from rags to ritches nigga i ain’t dumb
I got 99 problems but a bitch ain’t one

The fact that Jay-Z literally refers to “rap critics” proves the directness of his response. The song is an acknowledgement of, and an attempt to assuage, however belligerently, criticisms of Hip-hop, and him in particular, as sexist.

Nas’ attempt to respond to gender criticism was also inadequate, but it included an important observation, that white men were internalizing the language of Hip-hop in discussing black women. From Streets Disciple:

Up in the steam room chillin’, exfoliating the skin
It’s rarely men conversatin’ on ends, probably businessmen
I sense good taste, and they watch us, the spots an expensive place
Manhattan New York, I’m try’na keep steamin’
It’s good for the lungs, had plans for the evening
This man leans in, his boys laughing
Now I’m the spokesperson for Black men, this always happens
Says, “Since all Black women care about is who got dough
And all we do is call them either bitch or a Black hoe”
I say first brotha you ain’t gotta be that cold
Since you ignorant, I’ma show you how the facts go
The biggest example in scandal of history
Were Monica Lewinksy or Donald Trump’s pimping spree
Most woman who love Givenchy or Gucci
Are pretentious non-Black groupies or floozies
But who are we to blame, not the dames
It’s a man-made game, in essence our woman the same
Beautiful creatures, Black girls birthed the earth
So they deserve to earn man’s purse

Nas is self-conscious about having to represent all black men in this setting, and his only response is to suggest that white women are “the real hos” before relying on some Afrocentric comparisons of black women as the “earth mothers” before concluding, at least, that women deserve equal pay. The phrase “man’s purse” is interesting because we generally think of women as having purses, but the man being in possession of the purse in this circumstance that he holds something that rightfully belongs to a woman, namely equality. It’s not enough, and its problematic, but the response is visible.

This is again not the only response to gender criticism on the album, since Nas literally decides to rap as a woman on two tracks on the album. His female emcee persona, Scarlett, was so convincing that many fans didn’t realize she wasn’t actually a woman.

But the fact that Nas would have to pretend to be a woman to provide a female voice hints at the real problem in Hip-hop, that a dialogue on gender cannot occur as long as male emcees completely and totally dominate the culture. Male emcees are not responsible for this; corporations and market forces are.

The primary selling point of Hip-hop is its fictionalized package of black masculinity, one that rappers are beginning to question. As long as it is rap’s most lucrative ingredient however, corporations label owners will continue to shut out female emcees.

In other words, if you want this to change, then buy Jean Grae’s album.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Hear Me Out: Hip-hop and Gender Criticism | dropmagazine.com on 11 Oct 2007 at 11:58 am

    [...] Read the entire article, HERE. [...]

Comments

  1. gatamala wrote:

    Love your article, especially when you plugged Jean Grae. However, this

    “Male emcees are not responsible for this; corporations and market forces are.”

    Why must it always be either/or? Is it not both? Whenever we limit the roots/causes/contributions to this dichotomy we absolve one party of any responsibility AND underestimate the artists’ power. How can we be the people that created American music, then turn around and act like ol’ Mas’ made some of us write those lyrics?

    The “it’s not me, it’s the corp/system” argument expressed by males rings about as hollow as, “my family didn’t own any slaves.” It’s very easy to step into the role of the oppressor (vis a vis women) while claiming to be a victim of the corporation. Domination of a culture to the exclusion and detriment of 1/2 its members can’t be pinned solely on the corporation. As you’ve noted, sexism existed in our community (and everybody else’s) BEFORE hip hop.

    You touched on constructions of black masculinity. Here and now is a chance for black male emcees (frankly, my only concern])to step up and be men – by accepting and reconstructing their role in this charade – REGARDLESS of whether corporations want to cooperate. Since when has any facet of our society willingly and gladly evolved? All emcees etc… (male & female) will have to do their part to drag this culture back to humanity kicking and screaming. Control the con$umers (i.e., move the crowd), the white men in suits will follow. They did before.

  2. TheAssimilatedNegro wrote:

    bleh. This is way too long and elaborate to end up as a plug for Jean Grae’s album.

    I think your criticism of Crawford is weak because you don’t properly integrate the obvious point that Crawford is first and foremost slanting his content for humor and entertainment. So its silly to analyze word choice that may have been a toss-off joke for him, but has deep-rooted meaning for you and WOMEN OF THE WORLD.

    The same criticism applies to the lyrical analysis. I think you make some good points throughout, but they’re lost in the earnest effort at dissecting music/art like its literary non-fiction. I mean, rap as literary non-fiction is a somewhat interesting idea, but much like the Crawford point, we can’t lose sight that education/the facts/cultural implications on society (or vice versa) are secondary on the agenda to producing content that entertains.

    I also think you’d find challenges to your overall point in thinking about the relationship of hip hop and the NBA. Both are very racialized products, and both have a gender imbalance. But we wouldn’t claim the WNBA is held down because of anything having to do with “packaged black masculinity” would we? The analogy is not on the nose, but I hope close enough to demonstrate that the misogyny is not a black-and-white (pardon) situation.

  3. Blackfeet_Blackrock wrote:

    If gatamala’s “How can we be the people that created American music” isn’t as chauvinistic as dnA’s “unlike other mediums of artistic expression, something which is rarely acknowledged is that rappers regularly a(d)dress the problem of misogyny in Hip-hop” is clueless, then I’m not certain I can ever haul my American Indian ass out to to listen to all those women blues, country, or folk music pioneers who’ve been bitching about this topic far longer in verse far more poignant and clever.

  4. dnA wrote:

    Blackfeet: I may be “clueless” but you took me out of context. My comments were about “American popular entertainment,” and I specifically said “when was the last time you heard anyone from a major television or film company admit that their product was sexist or misogynist, or in someway perpetuated harmful stereotypes about women?”

    When was the last time you saw or heard Billie or Ma Rainey on TRL? not exactly relevant to a discussion of current popular culture, and your qualitative assessment on whether or not Hip-hop is “clever” doesn’t actually apply to my general point, which that the gender discourse that does exist in Hip-hop is harmed by the absence of female emcees. That absence has roots in both the culture itself and its corporate packaging, but I don’t see what your point contradicts what I’m saying. Your observation actually points to the absence that I am discussing.

    AN: “I think your criticism of Crawford is weak because you don’t properly integrate the obvious point that Crawford is first and foremost slanting his content for humor and entertainment.So its silly to analyze word choice that may have been a toss-off joke for him, but has deep-rooted meaning for you and WOMEN OF THE WORLD.”

    Imus also slanted his content for “humor and entertainment”, but that doesn’t make him not racist. Characterizing Crawfords comments as a “toss off” ignores the fact that his column on Lupe was titled “Lupe Fiasco, Jihadist”. Tying Lupe’s observation that Hip-hop is often sexist to radical Islamic terrorrism is pretty disturbing. Exonerating him on the basis that he is “entertainment” minimizes the impact his incessant mindless racist, religious and gender stereotyping has.

    As for the NBA, I’ve actually done posts discussing the fact that fewer fights happen in professional basketball than say baseball or hockey, but the word “thug” is tossed around in the media every time Allen Iverson looks sideways at a ref. I would say that a discussion of black masculinity is quite relevant to the identity of the NBA, including the way it is marketed. One of the big tensions present in professional basketball is that the fans are mostly white and the players are mostly black; you don’t think this contributes to the language used in the media to describe professional basketball?

    As for the WNBA, and I’m not sure you’re making this point, I find it hard to believe that one of its problems finding an audience has to do with a lack of masculinity in any package, period. That in itself reflects a certain kind of attitude towards female athletes.

    Gatemala: “Why must it always be either/or? Is it not both? Whenever we limit the roots/causes/contributions to this dichotomy we absolve one party of any responsibility AND underestimate the artists’ power. How can we be the people that created American music, then turn around and act like ol’ Mas’ made some of us write those lyrics?

    The “it’s not me, it’s the corp/system” argument expressed by males rings about as hollow as, “my family didn’t own any slaves.” It’s very easy to step into the role of the oppressor (vis a vis women) while claiming to be a victim of the corporationDomination of a culture to the exclusion and detriment of 1/2 its members can’t be pinned solely on the corporation. As you’ve noted, sexism existed in our community (and everybody else’s) BEFORE hip hop.”

    I think your criticism is right on. I agree with you that it does not have to be an “either/or,” and that individual male emcees certainly bear responsibility for providing sexist lyrical content, even when they are being encouraged to do so by corporate handlers and market forces.

    Thanks to everyone who took the time to comment.

    Peace,

    dnA

  5. not.some.ho wrote:

    assimilated negro,
    the criticism of crawford is on point precisely because the only way he can get a response from folks is by appealing to our most ignorant sentiments. There is meaning in the things we laugh at and meaning in the things we find entertaining. So your argument that it all fun and games for him is not such a good defense. Your attempted defense of rap as entertainment (as opposed to education) assumes a dichotomy that rings hollow. Perhaps popular culture should not be responsible for molding the minds of the world, but in a hyper-mediated era…that is part of our reality. Rap is not, nor will it ever be literary non-fiction. Thank god! But regardless of what we want to call it, its influence is wide (Think “MC Rove,” Turkish-German rap, a Tanzanian barbershop named “Nigga Style”). To call it just entertainment undermines its power.

    To address your last point, comparing the gender exclusiveness in hip-hop and the nba is apt. But i would say that women’s basketball is undervalued because of our mental link between black masculinity and athleticism. Women’s basketball has yet to be taken seriously at all levels. How many of us were even thinking about the Rutgers women’s team before Imus’ racial faux pas?

  6. Blackfeet_Blackrock wrote:

    dnA: If I took you out of context, it’s because your context is awful wiggly.

    “American popular culture” is a broad term. Popular refers to the masses, not to any specific time period. Modifiers like “modern” or “recorded” would’ve made more sense for an audacious claim.

    I like hip-hop, and at 30 yrs, it’s more than earned its own table, not just a seat at someone else’s. But that’s no call for literally discounting *every* other form of artistic expression just to make your point.

    And yes. during and even before and after Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith, women have addressed and even dared to flaunt the conventions of misogny and sexual violence in songcraft qua songcraft, through that subject matter, stylings, and blending stage persona with personality. That you haven’t heard or seen it outside your genre or time doesn’t make it non-existant or irrelevant.

    FWIW: I was once told to consider the demise of Orpheus/Orfeo for the ultimate revenge of women in song. I think I’m gonna reread it now…

  7. dnA wrote:

    Blackfeet, you said: “And yes. during and even before and after Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith, women have addressed and even dared to flaunt the conventions of misogny and sexual violence in songcraft qua songcraft, through that subject matter, stylings, and blending stage persona with personality. That you haven’t heard or seen it outside your genre or time doesn’t make it non-existant or irrelevant.”

    I think you’re right, but the point of my post is that what is unique to Hip-hop is the direct way in which emcees respond to criticism, not just adressing it indirectly through “subject matter, stylings, and blending stage persona with personality”. Part of their ability to do this rests in the efficiency of communication that modern society gives us, but either way what you’re referring to really isn’t comparable. It wasn’t my intention to suggest only Hip-hop deals with such issues, but that the internal discourse, and the way it responds directly to criticism in contemporary Hip-hop is almost entirely ignored.

  8. It Ain't Easel wrote:

    At first, I was shocked that dnA wrote off the women of other cultures and genres simply to make the arguments. Given all the passion, it seemed too defensive really, and I couldn’t help but wonder if the argument wouldn’t have been better made not by trying to stretch and strain by showing what hip-hop alone possesses (in essence, it’s at best a formalist argument, which truly could get dispelled by a simple comparison to anything else, unless you wanted to be rigidly inflexible).

    Why not the Iranian women singers who literally risk their livers under Shari’at to perform and criticize their living conditions? What about Aboriginal Australian or the Native American music scene which has it own NAMMY’s, rewarding many an outspoken artist. So no, responding to social issues within and without isn’t new or exclusive territory that hip-hop “discovered”.

    After reading it again with the clarification, I think I get what the attempt was, but it’s still not quite there for me. I’m more than a little dismayed at the disproportionate attention paid on this site and community to other genres and art forms outside of hip-hop as well.

    Yes the commercial and artistic influence is strong, but to negate or ignore what’s been taking place is to risk losing touch or credibility with what you’re trying to argue. Why, for example, in dnA’s response to “Blackfeet” if you sought to prove your point did you not automatically include Sister Rosetta Tharpe, Joan Armatrading, Tracy Chapman, or Nina Simone?

    I better hear what was sought in words now, but hip-hop still has this reactionary problem whenever it’s cited as the cause for something; it always takes the bait and argues from the defensive position. At 30+ yrs, it better start learning how to dump the mumbo jumbo pseudo rhetoric, and start asserting itself from a point of clarity and credibility that includes, in large part, what it actually shares in common with other forms of legitimate art.

    This includes the ability to challenge not only the establishment and status quo, sure, but to raise issues within the very frameworks of its own existence. That’s part of what makes any art more vibrant, and it’s not bad to point out that it’s what makes any form of art “real”.

    The rock world long ago learned how to embrace it’s “shock and provoke” aura, and turn it into a force. Hip-hop can do the same thing without apology and turn it into a force for whatever it wants.

    I don’t know why that’s so hard to accept or admit– is it too “white”? If so, get over it, because as any form of art matures, it must confront questions of what makes it so– every form of art throughout the ages has done so! It should be a noble thing to aspire to.

    All this does beg the question, however: when will Racialicious and its fans turn more attention and affection to people of color who’ve made strides and distinction in worlds outside of hip-hop.

    The amount of silence regarding Miko Marks struggle or rise to success over the past year is quite telling. For a young African-American woman from Michigan to move to San Francisco, hit it big out of left field within the on the *country* charts with an R&B sounding debut album that busts up the Nashville honky-tonk establishment , and nets her two best new artist awards (and a cameo by Erykah Badu in her first video, “Mama”) is incredible and should be supported as well. I just learned about her from friends, and have the CD on now, wow. Appreciate all the artists making strides wherever you find them!