Is this Village Voice cover illustration racist?

by Carmen Van Kerckhove

What do you think of this image?

It’s supposed to be Bob Dylan mowing down Kyp Malone from the band TV on the Radio. Martín Perna, who’s associated with the band, wrote a long letter to the Voice criticizing the image (see below).

Reactions to the letter that I’ve seen on other blogs are typical:

This is bullshit… if that was a picture of Dylan running over a member of the Artic Monkeys or some other white band no one would give a shit, they would be raving on how witty it was. (source)

and my favorite:

Only a Rascist would find that Rascist! (source)

But here’s Perna’s letter. Interesting parallel he draws to the ghetto party phenomenon:

Looking at this week’s cover of the Voice, I see a caricature of Bob Dylan in an electric mobility scooter, running over Kyp Malone, guitarist/vocalist of the band TV on the Radio. The drawing, I imagine, was supposed to comically illustrate Dylan’s new record edging out TVOTR’s “Return to Cookie Mountain,” in the paper’s 34th Annual Pazz & Jop poll [February 7–13]. This drawing is racist, unfunny, mean-spirited, and inaccurate.

Even in the post-Chappelle era of it being hip and edgy to discuss and portray ideas about race, there are still wrong, tasteless ways and this was one of them. Nowhere in the consciousness of Voice editors or illustrator David O’Keefe can we find memories of James Byrd, a black man who was dragged behind a truck to his death by white racists in Jasper, Texas, in 1998, or Arthur “J.R.” Warren, who was run over four times and killed for being black and gay in West Virginia in 2000, and all the other lynchings that happened in the U.S. before and since. These events are still fresh in the minds of black people, as well as in the hearts and minds of the rest of us who may not be directly victimized by these particular lynchings but who are nonetheless endangered by racism and committed to social justice and healing America of its sick racist condition.

O’Keefe and his colleagues may not have meant to intentionally be racist. They probably meant to be funny, like the University of Texas law students, Clemson University undergrads, or white college students nationwide who plan and publicize their blackface or “ghetto parties,” then act surprised that people find their actions offensive and unacceptable. That this picture could be drawn and not questioned or vetoed by any of the people who saw it prior to publication shows the level of ignorance and racism that persists in leftist institutions like the Voice that continue to posture as hip and progressive. It reveals that among decision-makers at the paper there is not one single person with any sort of racial consciousness or sensitivity who had the power or courage to send that picture back to the drawing board.

Racism aside, the drawing is snarky and simpleminded. Where is the love? Why such a nasty way to portray two fantastic musical entities who made award-winning records last year? Why only portray Kyp, when TV on the Radio is composed of four other equally talented core members plus a small army of extended family (including myself) who have contributed to the indescribably ecstatic sound of TVOTR onstage and on record. We struggle defiantly to collaborate and work in non-hierarchical, positive environments and this portrayal of one of our people strikes a blow against our collective dignity.

Every time our likenesses are used outside of our control—especially in stupid ways like this—it fosters false perceptions of who we are. We struggle on a daily basis (those of us with high media exposure much more than others) to be our true selves and not what the media creates of us. Inevitably, Kyp will have to respond to an endless stream of questions about this cover from scores of journalists over the next week when he’d probably rather be doing something else.

Intentionally or not, this cover sends the all-too-familiar message to people of color: Make something too unique, make something outside of your assigned place-role, and get run over by a white man. I could go on about it, about how wrong it is to create false competition between musicians; the headline “Blood on the Tracks!” gives the very false impression that there is serious beef with Dylan and TVOTR. I could complain about how you drew Kyp outfitted like the Nutty Professor rather than his true fly stylish self. All other criticism, however, would draw attention away from the more serious and sinister latent racism present that makes this cover possible to begin with. I pray that you will wise up and check yourself and get some people with some sense and sensitivity among your editorial staff.

Martín Perna
Baritone saxophone, flutes
Antibalas/TV on the Radio
Austin, Texas, and Brooklyn

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Village Voice lets editor go over racial concerns « Vox ex Machina on 03 Mar 2007 at 5:14 pm

    […] but wary over this. On the one hand, the Village Voice is not exactly known for racial sensitivity, especially lately, and it’s about time that they did something about that. If letting their editor go was the […]

Comments

  1. LM wrote:

    Perna’s letter makes a good case… and this from someone who’d never heard of TVOTR before a few minutes ago and who’d had only a passing (and forehead scrunching) glance of this Voice cover a few days ago.

    There’s a lot in pop culture that makes me cringe, so I nod along to Perna’s observation that at best, the Voice illustration was “snarky and simpleminded.” That’s unfortunately true in a lot of pop culture.

    So would the Voice have run the same illustration of a white artist getting run over? 1) Maybe; 2) I wish they didn’t run an illustration of someone getting run over, period.

    And for that reason, I question Perna’s assertion that the illustrator and Voice editors lacked “consciousness” about prior images… he may be right, but I think they may have thought of those things and then decided that a violent (though yes, cartoonish) image trumps all, even their own concerns about the potential offensiveness of an image.

    I guess my point is that our society’s culture is awash in violence (which is often overlaid or underpinned with racism)… and that’s the fallback excuse here: “It’s not racist, it’s just violent.”

    Wish it weren’t so.

  2. mtevc wrote:

    I think the band members final paragraph in his letter (which I will put in quotes below) is the most telling:

    “Intentionally or not, this cover sends the all-too-familiar message to people of color: Make something too unique, make something outside of your assigned place-role, and get run over by a white man. I could go on about it, about how wrong it is to create false competition between musicians; the headline “Blood on the Tracks!” gives the very false impression that there is serious beef with Dylan and TVOTR. I could complain about how you drew Kyp outfitted like the Nutty Professor rather than his true fly stylish self. All other criticism, however, would draw attention away from the more serious and sinister latent racism present that makes this cover possible to begin with. I pray that you will wise up and check yourself and get some people with some sense and sensitivity among your editorial staff.”
    Martín Perna

    Besides Perna’s dead-on assessment, the Village Voice has sucked for years. And, they know it. They’ve had changes galore, and they still can’t get it together. So, they have to resort to lousy and mean images on the cover. Pitiful.

  3. kim wrote:

    Perna is a candidate for a Racialicious contributor if ever there was one.

    I think the excerpted quote above makes the most powerful statement, and one which, interestingly, would not have struck so deeply upon first glance, due to the source being The Voice.

    I just can’t take anything they do too seriously, even when the cover art and accompanying article(s) seek to place a level of analysis and criticism to the psychological underpinnings and sociopolitical ramifications of a situation/event/news story.

    All that being said, Perna’s keen eye for a disturbing, enllightening perspective on how the art could be received, especially in light of its catiness, (which he deemed “snarky and simpleminded”) is invaluable, for understanding the nuances that infuse both the creation of the artwork, as well as its approval beyond the mock-up stage.

  4. Y. Carrington wrote:

    The racial symbolism of the image is bloody obvious, and the “Blood on the Tracks!” headline jacks it up ten notches. The fact that Bob Dylan began his career as an explicitly antiracist songwriter pisses this longtime Zimmerman fan off even more.

    And another thing—this shit is ageist as well. When did Dylan ever use a scooter?

  5. ebogjonson wrote:

    I’m with LM. It’s dumb and violent, and while dumb and violent are often racist, they aren’t in this case. This issue merits a longer discussion to unpack it, but three basic points:

    1 - The most racist thing about that image is Dylan’s nose. Perna’s notion that the cover evokes James Byrd is a depressing overreach, and it deflects our attention from the fact that the image poorly and snarkily depicts an actual event: i.e., a lot of people had money on TVOTR winning the Pazz and Jopp poll and Dylan won instead. Folks who are hear-hearing! are making the rather typical mistake of referencing the image’s global racial context without referencing its locally embedded context as the illustration of a specific circumstance or event. That’s lazy.

    2 - Perna is making the argument that ALL images of “black man being run over by white man” literally depict lynchings. This is basically the racial version of Dworkin speak where all pornography is functionally equated with rape. Both arguments are deeply flawed in that they ascribe certain magical, mimetic qualities to the visual image that I don’t believe are ALWAYS in play in EVERY image. It’s bad theory, is what I’m saying, but when has that every stopped anyone?

    3 - I don’t work for Perna or his publicist, so I’m hesitant to wade into an argument that has corporate/capitalist overtones. Perna isn’t just an observer/witness, he’s a member of TVOTR with a financial and reputational investment in Voice’s Pazz and Jopp poll. He’s absolutely right that “Intentionally or not, this cover sends the all-too-familiar message to people of color: Make something too unique, make something outside of your assigned place-role, and get run over by a white man.” But this point is a situational truth or irony, it’s not a smoking gun.

    Don’t get me wrong: Return to Cookie Mountain was my top album of 2006 so I agree that they were robbed. Also, OF COURSE the lame ass white folks who contribute to the Voice picked the old white dude. None of that means that that cover evokes James Byrd.

  6. Rob Schmidt wrote:

    If the illustration showed a cowboy running over an Indian, people definitely would object to it. Even if it illustrated a legitimate subject, such as a Cowboys vs. Redskins football game.

  7. merq wrote:

    Okay, I’m gonna say I don’t necessarily view this as racist. I decided to comment on it before reading the full article, so my opinion remains untainted.

    Are TVOTD’s eyes kinda bugged? Yes (but not insanely so). Are his lips kinda red? Yes again. But he is getting run over by a scooter, so I think that explains that.

    Why’s Dylan’s nose so friggin’ huge, though? I believe for the same reason everything else is going on here. The meanness inherent in caricatures. James Byrd, I think not.

  8. vandia wrote:

    For a moment, there, before I started reading the post, I thought ” Wow! Is Spike Lee being run over by Kramer?”

  9. Colin wrote:

    vandia:

    Seemed more like old Al Roker than Spike Lee, even, otherwise it seemed pretty close to what I thought, too. Granted, I have only a vague recollection of what Bob Dylan is supposed to look like, and I have only just now heard of TV on the Radio.

  10. ebogjonson wrote:

    >If the illustration showed a cowboy running over an Indian, people definitely would object to it. Even if it illustrated a legitimate subject, such as a Cowboys vs. Redskins football game.did indeed get run over in the poll by an elderly white gentleman.

    Now compare that image to ye olde liberal blackfacing fracasos. In those cases Billmon et al went deep in the racial crate for a completely random meme, blackface functionally depicting nothing except the artist’s own ignorance/unconscious racism.

    We all agree that image was juvenile, but racist to the level of the Washington football team’s racist logo? Nope. Now that awful thing is definitely racist, but the chain of association only holds strong if one experiences the image of a TVOTR front man depicted laying prone as the functional equivilant of a racist team mascot. I don’t, but that’s just me.

  11. Bananas wrote:

    Frankly, I couldn’t recognize either character, just saw a cartoon with someone on what looks like a motorized wheel chair driving over someone else.

    That’s all I saw. I had to read the comments to find out it that I was supposed to immediately recognize it as being racist.

    I looked again. Yup. The guy on the handicapped cart has lighter skin than they guy on the ground.

    I had to think about that, and the claims of racism. I’m left with only wondering this:

    If it was the other way around with Kyp Malone running over Bob Dylan, would we be having a conversation about racism?

  12. Aaron wrote:

    I’m surprised no one has mentioned that the drawing of Dylan, a Jew, with such a dramatic hook nose is also a racist caricature.

  13. kim wrote:

    Up-thread it is mentioned. Astute on both your parts, and recognized by me only on second glance.

  14. Sombra wrote:

    As so many events have raised to the level of wide-spread discussion recently, violence/anger/rage begets hate. So these images are repetitions of symbolic meanings for viewers/readers, some are unconscious, some are historical, depending on your point of view and lived experience. What I’m getting at is an antiracist politics of reading/viewing calls upon us to think critically and vigil what we are reinforcing through violent images. Thus, media folks are responsible for considering when to produce and disseminate images that can be read so multiply, and so negatively. I think it is safe to say that this image reinforced, for many people, a violence that reaches beyond the individuals portrayed.

    (In other words, the empistemic violence of representing and refiguring “naturalized” –i.e., assumed, unchallenged–structures of power and domination IS RACISM when deployed in the context of an unequal society where racism is one of our most virulent social problems and always already constitutive of more of the same.)

  15. merq wrote:

    Bob Dylan’s Jewish? Damn! I wondered why they made his nose so damn big, but chalked it up to general assholery (from the same word family as “assholeration.” look it up).

    Not cool.

  16. Tereza wrote:

    I agree with this analysis from another site saying that the cover is anti-Semitic: “You have Dylan portrayed as the ‘Evil Jew’stereotype (note that the scrowling, hook-nosed mug was often found in Nazi propaganda posters).”

    Look at this image , for example. It’s a poster for a Nazi propaganda film called The Eternal Jew from 1941.

    This is significant, because there has been quite a stir in recent years about a rising level of anti-Semitism in the U.S.

    Also, there have been well-documented and recurring tensions between the African-Amerian and Jewish communities in this country. But perhaps someone else here would be better equipped to address this phenomenon and how this cartoon may play into those tensions.

  17. kim wrote:

    Check out this link to another thread, older thread, here at racialicious, (Lyonside):

    http://www.racialicious.com/2006/12/22/links-for-2006-12-22/ - 26k -

  18. Lyonside wrote:

    Kim - and yet, like Merq, I’d zoned that Dylan was Jewish (I knew that once upon a time…)

    Overall, I’d peg the cover as tactless and borderline racist (probably unintentional, not that that’s an excuse, it just shows how internalized/ingrained racist imagery is). I’d agree with those who see the motor scooter as ageist, if I hadn’t at first glance thought Dylan was riding a tricycle!

  19. kim wrote:

    Ly:

    Believe me, I had to look 3 times at the ride to distinguish it from the trike myself. (You know why this is happening, yes? You never get over it, either.)

  20. Aaron wrote:

    Oh yeah, someone did mention the Dylan nose further up the thread, thanks for pointing that out. Dylan was born as Robert Allen Zimmerman and is most definitely of Jewish heritage, though I have no idea if he’s religiously observant (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_dylan).

  21. Kyla wrote:

    I agree with others that the cover is anti-Semitic in its portrayal of Dylan, especially since his nose is hardly the most noticeable thing about his face (at least, to me).

    Not having ever heard of Kyp Malone, I wasn’t sure whether it was a valid caricature of him or not. I did an image search on Google, though, and about the only thing they got right was his hair. I can buy that his tongue sticking out and the bugged eyes are because he’s been run over, but the drawing really looks nothing like him. The violence, too… I didn’t think of James Byrd, but I definitely did a double-take.

    Honestly, the cover just seems problematic, period, in more ways than one, even if it isn’t racist.

  22. eric daniels wrote:

    Stupid yes, insesntive of our racial history yes, Anti- P.C. yes but racist that’s a sterch. The album cover represented Old skol rocker running over the New Blood band TVOTR (the album is brillant) I am more concerned with ‘ghetto parties’ because in 10 years these white students will have an impact on many Black People’s lives (and other p.o.c) especially on issues like

    housing
    medical care
    judicial process
    employment
    school our children and grandchildren

    Nobody will remember the Village Voice’s cover in 10 yearsbut those white kids when they graduate and are having parties mocking other ethnic groups can you trust them with protecting Blacks and other P.O.C when they take over those branches of society.

  23. martin perna wrote:

    Note that the Voice fired editor David Blum a few days ago and replaced him with Tony Ortega. Story here:

    http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/runninscared/archives/2007/03/tony_ortega_nam.php

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.