links for 2007-02-01

Comments

  1. Kaywil wrote:

    Aaahhh, did Brady kill someone on purpose? And would an ordinary citizen be sued for $50mil? Or is this celebrity privilege gone wrong?

  2. Meg wrote:

    re brandy: i’d imagine they’re suing cos the family’s upset (someone did die) and some bloodsucking bastard (ie lawyer) has got in their ear. I think the colour of money is on ppl’s minds for this one but it would be interesting to see how it proceeds - compare her treatment maybe to the guy from prison break who also was in a car accident where someone died (but maybe wasn’t the driver). But this is all ‘allegedly’ until someone goes to court i guess.

  3. m wrote:

    The real issue is that a woman died and Brandy’s actions are allegedly the cause of this woman’s death. The reason why an “ordinary citizen” would not be sued for $50 million is because “ordinary citizens” do not have a successful music and acting career. Whether the victim’s family will ever receive anywhere near that much in compensatory and punative damages (or whether they have the right to sue for that amount) is besides the point. Brandy caused a series of events that resulted in the unnecessary death of a woman. The woman’s parents and children must now cope with that lose. Brandy and all other drivers whose recklessness results in such senseless deaths, nust be held accountable. Anyone who has ever studied law knows that the law (especially in the area of tort/personal injury law) understands that the aim of the law it to make victims “whole again” to recompense them for the damage they incurred due to the acts of others. A woman has died and nothing will bring her back, but is she was the sole bredwinner in the family, her children need to be compsenated for the loss income Brandy’s actions have caused and I have know problem with that. But I do have a problem with people making light of the current situation Brandy is in and trying to denigrate the victim’s family when Brandy’s alledged recklessness is the true eyesore in my opinion. I think its insulting to the victim and her family to question their motives when they have suffered such a senseless loss that is beyond repair. Injecting race and celebrity in this matter is quite insensitive and indicates thats some people refuse to appreciate the seriousness of Brandy’s actions.

  4. m wrote:

    In reading over my comments I noticed that I made some spellling and grammatical errors.

    OOPS :)

  5. Lyonside wrote:

    >The real issue is that a woman died and Brandy’s actions are allegedly the cause of this woman’s death

    I agree, and I think everyone should be accountable to the same standards… But then, I think Brandy should be charged with vehicular homicide, vehicular assault, or what have you like any other person and go through the criminal court process like anyone else. (misdemeanor? sounds like someone was already bargained down).

    Then, if that can’t proceed for whatever reason, it goes to civil court for damages, etc. and damages should be awarded based on, as you said, loss of income, suffering, etc of the victim… not on the size of the pursestrings of the offender/defendent.

  6. FNFVF wrote:

    On Stealing a Native Identity - NativeVue
    Hat tip to Rob. “What typifies most westerns, from the early silent films to today, has always been the white man becoming an Indian. And by doing so, Natives are further led toward extinction while promoting this new amalgam as the American identity”

    Speaking of stealing, Rob never wrote that.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.