links for 2006-12-13

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Current
  • email
  • Print

Comments

  1. mr guy wrote:

    I had to comment on the Tufts Uni article.It’s one thing to argue about aff-action.But this is the way they choose to do it?And They claim it’s suppose to be anti-racist?From what the article says:

    “black students making up about 7 percent of the undergraduate population.”

    7% that’s it.So are they trying to say that a majority or even half(just how many black students got a free pass, and how can they figure it out?) of that 7% are getting unearned privilege by attending the school?While all white students earned everything?I get a feeling that even if the school was only 0.01% black they would still think the black kids are getting a free all expense payed trip to college.With or without aff-action.

  2. Rob wrote:

    Kinda makes you wonder how whites will react when they become 49% of the population.

  3. Lyonside wrote:

    Rob: won’t matter about population numbers – what matters is where the money and power are. So long as wealth (land, businesses, etc.)ownership/CEOs/corporate stockholders/media powerbrokers/college boards are predominantly white, the status quo will continue.

  4. Rob wrote:

    True.

    A perfect example is South Africa which brings me to another point which I hope isn’t too off topic.

    Just recently, the white governing body handed over power to the black majority in South Africa. The current head of state reminded the world that the whites there should be given credit for performing such a huge gesture. I originally scoffed at his appeal for credit on doing the right thing.

    Now that I think about it, my opinion has changed wholeheartedly. It actually was a truly noble gesture and should be commended. It’s almost impossible for the ruling party to simply give up power to someone else. I know for a fact that almost no other white controlled nation would perform such a task.

  5. gatamala wrote:

    “It actually was a truly noble gesture and should be commended. It’s almost impossible for the ruling party to simply give up power to someone else. I know for a fact that almost no other white controlled nation would perform such a task. ”

    An invading, oppressive minority “returns” the rightful owners’ land to them. You consider that a noble act! First, many poor black South Africans are still fighting for land that was taken from them. Second, even after the regime left, white civil servants were permitted to keep their jobs as part of the bargain (COPS, government officials). Third, those who perpetrated violent acts toward the blacks were given full amnesty by the Truth & Reconciliation committee. I wouldn’t say these magnanimous whites gave up [some]power easily. Actually, I thought it was quite noble that the blacks did not stage a full onslaught of revenge…as is happening in Iraq.