10 hints for my white friends

by guest contributor Philip Arthur Moore, originally published at TheThink

Before taking my first ever study abroad trip, I was told that there would be certain social and cultural norms that I would have to adapt to without pressing the issue too much. I knew that as a visitor into the Vietnamese community, no matter how odd, foreign, hypocritical, or just plain weird the people seemed, it wasn’t my place to call them out on it. To be sure, I found myself frustrated at times that I was unable to cause some sort of communal change in areas that I found a bit off, but that was the price I paid to study abroad. I knew that no matter how close I got to the community, through my acquisition of the Vietnamese language or friendly conversations, there were some things I just could not do as a non-Vietnamese person.

It is with this train of thought that I feel the need to enlighten some of my white brothers and sisters about how not to approach the black community in the United States. Now, I realize that black Americans and white Americans live in the same political state, but often times they might as well be defined as two separate nations. Young black children in predominately white schools might as well be on a study abroad trip as far as I’m concerned. White Americans who dare travel into predominately black, brown, or yellow neighborhoods often feel like they are living in another country among a sea of non-white people.

Little is admitted about the real lack of integration in our nation while whites kick back and enjoy television shows like Flavor of Love and think they’ve truly just enjoyed a slice of black life in the U.S. Non-whites watch television shows like Friends and think that most white people drink bowl-sized cups of latte. Many watch the newest season of Survivor (Cook Islands) and actually believe they’ve been schooled on diversity.

Of all the races in the United States, white people have the hardest time understanding racial oppression. This is a fact. Much like the men (including myself) in the United States who just cannot understand what it feels like to be a woman who is judged by her bra and waist measurements, white Americans cannot put themselves in the position of racial other-ness on a daily basis. Unless of course they go abroad or to New York, Chicago, DC, Altanta, Detroit, Philly, LA, Houston, or anywhere else with more black people than say, Altoona, PA. This is not to say that white people cannot understand racial opporession. It’s just that, well, most of them don’t.

With that said, I’ve put together ten pointers that will help my fellow American citizens integrate themselves more easily into a black America. Granted, many of my white brothers and sisters will never feel the need to voluntarily put themselves around people shades darker than themselves (unless it involves sex, economic or sociopolitical domination), but for those who do want to take on a grand adventure of integrating themselves with blacks in a comfortable fashion, look no further.

What follows are ten rules that may help you blend in easier with black Americans and reduce frictions between yourselves and them. Consider it a study abroad guide to black America. Now, surely there will be some white people who read the following rules and get upset about them, but just remember, when you put yourselves around a lot of black people, you are on a study abroad trip. Suck it up, deal with it how you must, and keep it moving.

Things White People Shouldn’t Do…
(10 Rules from your Half-brother, With Love)

Rule #1: Say the word “Nigger”.

This one’s pretty self explanatory. I understand that a number of my white brothers and sisters feel the need to sing along with rap songs and repeat a lot of the things that black rappers say. But, I asure you, this angers a great deal of black people. Many of us are very uncomfortable with the word “nigger”, and far fewer of us use it than is portrayed on television. For your own safety and the safety of those around you, please avoid using this word. For more explanation, please continue reading about the word “nigger”…

Rule #2: Throw “ghetto” parties (unless one actually lives in the ghetto) or dress up in blackface, brown-face, yellow-face, or any other-face that contradicts one’s own skin tone (Halloween exemptions on a case by case basis).

It seems that as of late, white people have been on the up and up when it comes to throwing ghetto parties. Perhaps this coincides with the birth of hipsterism, I’m not sure. In any event, these ghetto parties can lead to nothing but sore relationships between black Americans and white Americans who believe that dressing like black people is flattering, funny, entertaining, or harmless. For your own safety and the safety of those around you, please avoid painting yourself with shoe polish for kicks and giggles. That hurts black peoples’ feelings, and you wouldn’t want to do that. Would you?

Rule #3: Invest too much time in racial satire (unless it involves white Europeans).

Whether it’s on TV, in the newspaper, or in music, racial satire is a pretty touchy subject. Try to acquaint yourself with your surroundings before popping off at the mouth some crude joke that might have worked in your all white community. I assure you, this does nothing but upset black people.

Rule #4: Talk about one’s family related problems when minorities bring up institutional and societal oppression (this also includes sexual assault, alcoholism, mental retardation, or various forms of cancer).

Rape is horrible. Alcoholism, mental retardation, and cancers all suck. But, in truth, no one wants to hear about all of that when a discussion is being held on racial oppression in the United States. I notice a lot of my white brothers and sisters bringing up their disfunctional family as a defense for their racism. This logic doesn’t really help anything in your relationships with black people. If the topic of discussion is about racial oppression, stay on racial oppression. I’m sorry about the rape. I really am. But now is not the time to talk about it in defense of your bigotry.

Rule #5: Condemn minorities for self-segregation.

I notice a lot of this in academic settings, especially at my university. When diversity comes up in conversation, white people are quick to jump on the “they self segregate!” bandwagon as a defense for their actions that cause racial, sexual, and religious minorities to pull away from the main stream. As I have noted before, not many white people are forced to be around people of color, unless it’s on a study abroad trip or political agression tip. For my white brothers and sisters who like to condemn minorities for self segregation, I’d like to point your attention to a widely read magazine called The Expat. This magazine would not be possible without the self-segregation of white people living in non-white nations. Should I condemn my white brothers and sisters for hanging out together in downtown Ho Chi Minh City instead of integrating themselves with the local community? Surely not. They look happy together.

Rule #6: Use the phrase “human race” when discussing racism.

Human beings are not a race. We are bipedal primates belonging to the mammalian species. So, please. No one really believes that you only see the “human race” when dealing with your fellow primates. The human race does not exist. Saying something like this comes off as disingenuous and it kills real dialogue. Please, no more “human race” talk.

Rule #7: Condemn minorities for having their own television stations, radio stations, and student groups (i.e. “Why can’t we have WET?!”).

This is another extremely popular talking point by American whites. Please avoid this subject in large crowds of minorities. The problem with the “WET Question” is that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of WET’s on TV already. And even the stations that are for non-whites are owned by whites. Also, the assumption in the “WET Question” is that whites are not on non-white stations. Watch BET for a while and you’re sure to find whites. Just about as many whites as there are blacks on CNN and ABC.

Rule #8: Bring up Freedom of Speech when defending one’s bigotry or racial mishaps.

We all love Freedom of Speech. But no one really believes that we have it. Oddly enough, I only hear the “1st Amendment” argument from my white brothers and sisters when the topic of racial satire (see Rule #3) comes up. I don’t see this argument much from non-whites. The first step to recognizing that this argument is flawed is realizing that everyone believes in Freedom of Speech, but no one believes in being treated like an animal. Please, when it comes to satire, jokes, or normal conversation, table the Freedom of Speech argument and come up with some other explanation behind your bigotry or racial mishaps, like how you were raised.

Rule #9: Bring up the success of European, Asian, African, or Latin American immigrants while in discussions about the status of black America.

One word. Slavery.

Rule #10: Whisper the word “black” or hesitate before saying the word “black” while in discussions about black people.

I understand that many of my white brothers and sisters are only accustomed to using the word “black” as a pejorative. But, I assure you, blacks use the word as an empowering word. To blacks, the word “black” is synonymous with powerful, strong, resilient, beautiful, rock solid, valiant, among a host of other nice words. When you hesitate before saying the word “black” or whisper it like it’s a bad word, it gives off a negative reflection of your views about black people. Say the word “black” loud and proud. Blacks have been doing it since 1968.

With these 10 hints toward smoother interactions between my white brothers and sisters and my black brothers and sisters, I hope that things do get better. And remember, it is not your place to try to shape black America’s feelings, reactions, or thoughts about the things that bother us. Our feelings are our feelings. Please respect those feelings. We are human beings too. I hope that with these hints, your travels and adventures into black America are far more enjoyable than anything else you’ve experienced up until this point. Happy Trails!!!

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. “10 hints for my white friends…” « Woman of (an)other Color on 28 Nov 2006 at 7:18 pm

    […] 28 Nov 2006 “10 hints for my white friends…” Posted by onebrownwoman under Amazing People , Oppression  Of all the races in the UnitedStates, white people have the hardest time understanding racial oppression. This is a fact. Much like the men (including myself) in the United States who just cannot understand what it feels like to be a woman who is judged by her bra and waist measurements, white Americans cannot put themselves in the position of racial other-ness on a daily basis. Unless of course they go abroad or to New York, Chicago, DC, Altanta, Detroit, Philly, LA, Houston, or anywhere else with more black people than say, Altoona, PA. This is not to say that white people cannot understand racial opporession. It’s just that, well, most of them don’t. - Philip Arthur Moore; read the entire thing here. […]

Comments

  1. troglodyte wrote:

    I sincerely hope this article is meant as satire.

    What should I eat in the presence of black people? How should I dress?

    May I use words like “chicanery” or “masticate”? e.g. Yes, I masticate many times daily.

    Will uhhh… afro-ame… err… black, sorry. Let me start again.

    Are you kidding me?!?! Give people a little credit. I think “human beings” are intelligent and flexible enough that they do not have to follow a simplistic and narrow set of rules for human behavior.

    If in Japan, an American fails to refill the drink of her Japanese boss with both hands, I am willing to bet that the Japanese will give her the benefit of the doubt.

    What a self-righteous, didactic piece of worm dung.

  2. margaret wrote:

    You’d think white people would know better, wouldn’t you? You know what I think? They largely DO know better. The racist assholes you’ve encountered just don’t give a shit.

  3. Vandia wrote:

    I understand some of the points you are making. The rest is reverse-racism.

  4. Kenda wrote:

    Maragaret, I think saying that most white people know better and that the “racist a**holes you’ve encountered just don’t give a s***” pretty much shuts down the conversation. You don’t have to be an overt racist to participate in a racist act. You are not somehow excused from the conversation just because you do not consider yourself a racist.

  5. the Unknown soldier wrote:

    To Vandia: Reverse racism? didn’t take long for that gem to spew from your mouth like the projectile of vomit that it is. But in the interests of fairness, I’ll give you a chance to clarify your remarks so I can gladly shoot them down.

  6. Lyonside wrote:

    Wait, read the “rules” again, sans snarky commentary (and yes, it was meant to be funny, but not necessarily satirical (if so, what would it be making fun of?) …

    Does anyone who objected to the post REALLY think that any of those are wrong? The only one I flinch at is self-segregation, but then again, as a mixed person, it’s always impossible for me to self-segregate, so I can see the exclusive feeling there.

    But really, does anyone object substantively to the “rules?” Why?

  7. troglodyte wrote:

    Perhaps the reason why whites would pause in consideration of the politically correct term to use to reference blacks (rule #10) is that people are constantly jumping down their throats if they make a social faux pas. Why don’t we drop the classifications all together and refer to everyone as homosapiens? As in “Denzel Washington is one sexy and fine looking homosapien man.”

    If that article passes for humor, i would hate to see what the author does for fun. borrrrring. And I don’t think the article is facetious. After all, even you agree with the list and more significantly, the concept of a list itself.

    Tolerance works both ways. If my friend unknowingly and innocently offends me, I make the common courtesy of forgiving him. It’s all about context.

    As they say, even a dog knows when it is bumped into and when it is kicked.

    The lack of tolerance on BOTH sides of the political spectrum is the reason why we cannot make more progress in addressing societal ills.

  8. B wrote:

    re: Margaret’s comment

    I’m an urban academic, and spent the entirety of my childhood and most of my teens in an overwhelmingly white suburb in Connecticut. Before I moved to the city, I was almost always the only black person wherever I was, and frequently the only non-white person.

    Where I grew up, the vast majority of white people could have used those rules, and certainly did not know any better. They were by no means rare, nor were they remotely aware of the racism in their interactions with me.

    When I moved to a rather integrated city, and later worked with people from a variety of ethnic backgrounds who are attuned and interested in issues of race, I encountered white people that were very different from the ones with whom I grew up. None of the white people I intentionally associate with would be as clueless as the ones the author wrote the rules for, but they’re just as aware of the existence of such people as I am. (Some friends have racist/clueless family members or old friends. Some of them have had other people make racist statements about non-whites in their presence because they assume that they, as white people, won’t be offended.)

    So, I would agree with you that *some* white people know better, but a whole of them do not, particularly if they haven’t interacted with non-whites on a personal or professional level (One’s maid or nanny doesn’t count, and referring to that one, lone, person of color one occasionally hangs out with is tired as well).

  9. B wrote:

    Oh, and thanks to “the Unknown Soldier” for pointing out the “reverse racism” thing.

    To put it bluntly, “reverse racism” implies there’s some sort of appropriate or right form of racism–that whomever is the “reverse racist” has done racism the “wrong” way. In other words, saying “reverse racism” is like saying that racism against people of color is somehow normal and natural.

  10. Lyonside wrote:

    >Why don’t we drop the classifications all together and refer to everyone as homosapiens? As in “Denzel Washington is one sexy and fine looking homosapien man.”

    Eh, some classifications are valid and necessary. Case in point: there’s a group of people in a high school photo. You want to point out the cool friend or funny girl. Someone who is uncomfortable with race or terrified of giving offense might hem and haw for a while, going, “The one with the tie… no, the other one with the tie… no, the other other one with the striped tie” when it would be really easy to say, “The Asian kid on the right.” Which, if the person you’re talking to has a racial clue, is going to possibly offend them ANYWAY: after all, if you have no problem with race, then why can’t you TALK about it in a grown-up way?

  11. troglodyte wrote:

    i was being sarcastic.

    that is my whole point. when self-appointed dictators of “enlightened” decorum demand a restricted set of behavior and vocabulary, the results can be absurd and unproductive.

    i guarantee that somewhere right now, there is a white being castigated for saying, “oh that’s the guy over there, the guy with the red shirt, the black guy.”
    “hey why you gotta point out that he’s black?? for your information, the proper term is african-american, you ignorant fool.”
    that kind of nonsense.

  12. Lyonside wrote:

    >there is a white being castigated for saying, “oh that’s the guy over there, the guy with the red shirt, the black guy.”
    “hey why you gotta point out that he’s black?? for your information, the proper term is african-american, you ignorant fool.”

    And I agree, that’s being too tetchy.

    But I’ve also been on the other side of the fence, in which the person speaking (not even necessarily a white person) makes a point of mentioning race or ethnicity whether it’s important or not to the story. I.e., “So then this black guy says to me…” Or, “This Asian girl was so rude…” or “So my Jew friend said…” (that last one comes from my 18YO cousin, and I’ve TOLD him that it can brand him as bigoted, even though he’s not - he’s from the sticks and looks like a Nazi recruitment poster - I’ve warned him that whatever works in his rural school is NOT going to fly in college).

  13. cloudcome wrote:

    Well I guess this might be the beginning. But I was really hope for the next ten rules, or the next ten after that…. You lead into it so well I thought your ten points would go farther. Assuming we learned the first ten rules in Race Consciousness 101, can you go on to RC 201? I would really like to hear what else you have to say.

  14. Teresa Jones wrote:

    I LOVE THIS! I’m forwarding it to all my friends. And watching and waiting for part 2.

  15. mararock wrote:

    “If in Japan, an American fails to refill the drink of her Japanese boss with both hands, I am willing to bet that the Japanese will give her the benefit of the doubt.”

    Um, Trog? You’d be surprised.

    I think the point here is to be sensitive to what other people, who are a minority in your country or culture, prefer, as opposed to running them over with what YOU prefer.

    But I sense a real defensive tone coming from your posts, so perhaps you truly don’t give a **** — in which case both I and the original poster are wasting our breath.

    Perhaps a long-term stay in a country where you are a minority, where you don’t have disproportionate tourist wealth, and from which you can’t escape for a certain period of time might be in order. Just for the sake of new experiences, you know?

    Have a nice day.

  16. troglodyte wrote:

    Mararock,
    I do care, which is I am posting in the first place.

    “Perhaps a long-term stay in a country where you are a minority, where you don’t have disproportionate tourist wealth, and from which you can’t escape for a certain period of time might be in order. Just for the sake of new experiences, you know?”

    This is the kind of holier-than-thou lecturing that turns my stomach. How could you make any assumptions about me when you have never even met me? Or do you resort to the ultimate trump card in modern political discourse?

    FYI, I am a racial minority. So what next? Shall we compare horror stories of racism. May I email you my resume of suffering at the hands of bigotry? That way I can establish my legitimacy in discussing issues of sensitivity and race. Give me a break.

  17. deb wrote:

    Journalism professor Robert Jensen wrote an article about Ghetto parties. Anyone read Rent-a-Negro or visited http://www.rent-a-negro.com/ lately?

  18. Daniel wrote:

    Well, I find Philip Arthur Moore a lot funnier than Borat at best and perhaps a bit lacking in the area of perspective at worst. The first question I would have for him is, where does he live? Since he does not tell us we don’t know. In fact, he reveals very little about himself at all and I noticed that he did not respond to any comment posted on his top ten list. Let’s take a quick look at his points:
    1. This one is, perhaps, the most ridiculous one. If a black person has to tell a white person that they should not use the n word, they are likely wasting their breath. With the possible exception of a 140 year old white male who has been in a coma since the end of the civil war, there is absolutely no defensible reason for anybody to use the word, especially white people. Secondly, Philip’s assertion that blacks do not use the word often is dubious at best. This viewpoint may be related to where he lives so it may be that he is the one who needs to get out of his comfort zone and come to the South Bronx where I live. I hear the N word constantly in my neighborhood. I am not exaggerating. It is used in countless ways, loudly and proudly, mostly by folks who either have no concept of history or who just don’t give a damn. In fact, just this morning, heading to the 5 train, I heard one young man incorporate the word six times into one sentence. His two friends both responded in like fashion, mixing the n word with the f word, a very popular verbal cocktail, at least in the Bronx.

    2. The concept of throwing “ghetto parties,” even when living in the “ghetto” is ridiculous, so if that’s what Philip means then I agree on that 100%

    3. Racial satire is always going to be offensive to somebody, so it is generally a bad idea. Of course, if you’re black, racial satire is usually accepted, regardless of which race you are making fun of. I’m not passing judgment here, that’s just the way it is. So, I guess I agree with Philip on this one too.

    4. This one is a bit tricky. While I agree that it is extremely annoying for people in a particular discussion to start bringing up something seemingly unrelated, we should all be open to different perspectives and we should realize that different people relate to things in different ways. I can’t really be definitive here since I would actually need to hear a conversation in its entirety before I could judge whether or not this rule is valid. An interesting point, but more qualification is needed here.

    5. This one is as obvious as thunder following lightning. None of us should be making it a practice to condemn anybody, especially for behavior that we may not understand completely. I’m with you on this one Philip.

    6. This one is highly questionable Philip. All of us are actually members of the species, Homo Sapiens. The mammalian class actually includes about 5000 species, including modern humans aka Homo Sapiens. You might want to review a little basic biology before making such statements and you should consider correcting this piece of misinformation in your list. Modern science has been unable to prove any of the commonly held beliefs about race and they have only been able to show that there are different phenotypes exhibited among Modern Humans, mostly related to migratory patterns of different groups over the last 100,000 years or so. It is important to remember that race is really a concept, not a scientific fact. Race is a concept, invented mainly by white Europeans to describe what we now know to be genetic phenotypes. They used (and still do) race to place white Europeans at the top and black Africans at the bottom. We now know that genetically, we are all 99.9% similar. The outward differences we describe as Black, White or Asian is actually less than .1% in terms of genetic diversity. The fact that many people are ignorant is indisputable. This is a huge topic and I encourage everybody to do some research here before seriously discussing race. Technically, however, you are correct; there is no Human Race.

    7. This one is just ridiculous and I agree with you 100%.

    8. This one is questionable. Your experience is certainly valid and I do not doubt that some of your white friends have used the argument of free speech just as stupidly as you described. So, I agree with you on that part. You do make some bad statements here, especially, “We all love Freedom of Speech. But no one really believes that we have it. ” Really? Nobody believes that we have free speech? Please Philip, try to be more precise. These are, after all, rules. (Your words) I believe that we have the freedom of speech and I also believe that many people and groups have and will attempt to erode that freedom. This concept is huge. You should be more careful here.

    9. This one is just too vague. You need to clarify. You can’t simply cut somebody down by saying slavery. We should all know how terrible the institution of slavery was in America, and the lasting negative effect it has had on American Blacks. If you are directing your one word response towards the ignorant than I agree. You should elucidate, however. Clarity is never a crime.

    10. This one is a little disingenuous. While I agree partially and I certainly have no problem or hesitation in using the word, there are many black people who do not like the word. You fail to address this in your last rule.

    Interesting list.

  19. Carmen Van Kerckhove wrote:

    “If a black person has to tell a white person that they should not use the n word, they are likely wasting their breath.”

    I guess you never saw this:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=XURRzofbMc0

  20. Daniel wrote:

    Good afternoon, Carmen. Thanks for the link! No, I never heard that story, but it does not change my mind. I do not believe the teacher’s explanation. Regardless of the fact that it is likely many of the students did and do use the word frequently as this is certainly the case in my neighborhood, I do not excuse the teacher for using the word. There is absolutely no circumstance that would lead a white person to use the n word without the full knowledge that it was wrong to do so. If you read between the lines of the story, it is obvious that the teacher was and is frustrated with the use of the term (perhaps a lot more) and he made a split-second judgment based on that frustration to lash out at the student. Whether or not the student used the term first in that instance is irrelevant because it still does not excuse the teacher for using the word. My stance is that if a white person uses the word, they already know that it is wrong. Telling them what they already know will not change their mind. If a black person wants to tell a white person that it is wrong, they should do so, by all means. I did not mean by saying that it was a waste of breath to imply that a black person would be wrong for saying that it was wrong. I just do not accept any excuse from a white person for using the word.
    I deal with this every day because many of the black people I know here in New York City do use the word very casually. My friends in the neighborhood call me the N word all the time even though I tell them I do not like the word. They usually roll their eyes at me, sigh and say, “N –Please” Even though I know they view the word as a term of endearment and most of them would not be offended if I used it towards them, I refrain from doing so because I believe it is wrong. Look, I was married to a black woman for many years and even she called me the N word sometimes. Beyond that, Puerto Ricans and Dominicans in my neighborhood use it all the time, often shouting it across the street. This is my life, it’s real and it’s not on TV!
    Do you know what happened to the teacher? Now I want the follow up story! I’ll have to look this up later tonight, but please post more links to the story if you have them.
    Thanks again, Carmen, I really appreciate the response.

  21. RODNEY wrote:

    I say let people say what they want that way you dont get blindsided by a comment or action that you wouldn’t expect because everyone got to be so sensitive and politcally correct now a days. If they feel a certain way or think a certain way let them be honest and open and say and do what they want. At the very least you can help them to understand why it is wrong or you will know who is who.

  22. kim wrote:

    Rodney,

    Surely you jest. To borrow phrasing from the old rap song, I Got the Power, you seem to feel that anyone should say any demeaning, harmful, threatening thing they feel, and in fact, “hold it like a national flag, and upraise it.”

    We do not allow or accept this ideal (read it: ideal, ideal, ideal) when it comes to the way men interact with women, and we must not condone the cloning of Rush Limbaughs, the pre-crossover-persona of Ice Cube and co., the AM radio talk show hosts that litter the dial, and anyone else who fits this description.

    Communication is about discovery. When we refuse to even communicate to the other person that we have been deeply offended, we condone the offense. We become complicit.

    If one’s politics are “sticks and stones…,” then I suppose the language free for all works for you. But let’s face it, in the Black community where skin fade creams, permanent hair relaxers, colored contact lenses and the ever-present spector of being taunted as African (no hyphen, please)still haunt the hallways and dreams of our young people,and lie as subtext in how we speak to each other (ya’ll, I should say…count me out of this one), we not only need to watch our words, there are times when we need to wash them.

  23. kim wrote:

    Just one more thing for the list, humorous and always timely, though ridiculous at points:

    When in a brief interaction with a Black woman, do not feel the need to connect with her by punctuating your sentences with “…,Girl/Giiirrl.” This completely takes my breath away, and not necessary for you to reach me across the chasm that our zip codes say exist.

    If you feel the need, at least wait to determine if it is indeed within my own speech pattern.

    -ciao

  24. Daniel wrote:

    You made some great points here, Kim. The line, “…not necessary for you to reach me across the chasm that our zip codes say exist.” is one of the best I’ve heard in a while.
    Thanks!

  25. LaJolieChatte wrote:

    I would not be surprised if the people that were most offended by this article were white. Instead of shooting down what he has to say, try analyzing it. You know, just like Daniel did. I know I’m going to get backlash for the “white” comment but I really do not care. Seeing as how I am biracial, I believe I am entitled to criticize white people. Although, if you met me, I doubt the first thing that would come to mind is “white”.

    About “reverse-racism”, try reading Beverly Tatum’s “Why are all the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?”
    She defines racism as a system of advantage based on race. So the idea of “reverse-racism” does not fly in my book.

    Hmm, Trog, don’t know where you grew up but running into the type of people that Philip describes is not that uncommon. I’m from NYC and I’ve still encountered those types of people. I doubt Philip is saying that all white people are like that. He’s just saying that he’s encountered enough that do fit that description to write this article.

  26. bad username wrote:

    Question for Rule #4: If you’re a white woman can you bring up sexism as institutional and societal oppression when discussing racism?

  27. kim wrote:

    When discussing RACISM? Doesn’t your question answer your question?

    (Unless, of course, you’re talking about the triple whammy, in which case one would then have to create, in outline form, the hierarchy of racist oppressive forces in its many combinant and recombinant [can one say that?] forms.)

  28. bad username wrote:

    but isn’t sexism analogous to racism?

  29. kim wrote:

    You are aware that Black women are always asked to prioritize these concerns when it comes to their allegiances and activism, yes?:

    “Sister, are you a Black Woman first, or a Black person? - Which group are you going to secure rights for first?”

    Does whiteness privilege one above blackness? On how many levels? Is white female oppression as disfranchising as black female oppression?

    Each person must ask themselves these questions, and decide the route to walk.

    Does sisterhood prevent racism, bigotry, oppression, exclusion, heterosexism, homophobia, etc., from occurring; from exacting a terrible price from the life and dignity of another woman’s life? Is there strength and unity and unconditional love there? Does it protect all of the women? Does it seek to? hmmm….

  30. belledame222 wrote:

    You know, this whole “let” thing is really bogus. Yeah, no one likes feeling like they’re being jumped on for faux pas. This is meant as a sort of etiquette guide, I take it, so that you maybe just maybe might avoid such situations in future. Rage and foam about the UNFAIRNESS of it if you want; keep right on being a “troglodyte” if you want; just don’t expect people to respond with twinkles and sunshine when you do.

    Cause–>effect. It’s not THAT difficult to understand, is it? apparently so.

    i think really when people complain about not being “allowed” to say blahblah, what they really mean is, they want to be able to say whatever they please without getting a response they don’t care for. Which is a -bit- different from being “allowed” to say what you want without, like, being thrown in jail, even losing your job.

    You can’t -force- people to not be offended by you. You say what you want; but that comes with the responsibility of accepting that there are consequences. And if you’re gonna stick your fingers in your ears and go LALALALALA when anyone else complains about -their- feeling silenced, stifled, oppressed, what on earth makes you think they should give you what you can’t or won’t give yourself?

  31. belledame222 wrote:

    >You are aware that Black women are always asked to prioritize these concerns when it comes to their allegiances and activism, yes?:
    “Sister, are you a Black Woman first, or a Black person? - Which group are you going to secure rights for first?”>

    It’s “both/and,” not either or; further, the whole of such intersecting oppressions is often greater than the sum of their parts.

  32. kim wrote:

    > It’s “both/and,” not either or; further, the whole of such intersecting oppressions is often greater than the sum of their parts.

  33. bad username wrote:

    OK… but isn’t sexism analogous to racism?

    alluding back to Rule #4, when “minorities” bring up institutional and societal oppression, wouldn’t a white woman bringing up sexism as institutional and societal oppression be on even footing?

    i mean, i don’t know who the hell would bring up being raped or abused when people start talking about racism, but if people start talking about racism, wouldn’t talking about sexism be a fair thing to discuss as being a similar institutional and societal oppression?

  34. kim wrote:

    Separate but not equal. Similar, but not….

    Doesn’t the ‘whole of such intersecting oppressions’ being ‘greater than the sum of their parts,’ include without precluding, and yet, in encompassing the parts, constitute the ‘greater’?

    Not to create a hierarchy of oppression, as has been said even here at this blog (to me, by Lyonside) being mindful of the sage words of some radical feminists from my college years, but…in essence, a discussion of similar institutional and societal oppression must be had, in order to create an environment where everyone understands that there is hurt, there are rocks on the road, ‘floorboards turned up and places where there ain’t been no floorboards .’

    Yes, the discussion must be had, but not as an act of relieving one of the burden of considering the other’s sentiments. Not as diversion, or dilution, or interjection.

    Kind of like in a marriage. Listening while the other person speaks, taking time to digest and acknowledge what they said, and what they meant. Sometimes one only gets the chance to speak from one’s own perspective when the moment is less intense, the mood a bit changed.

  35. kim wrote:

    And for the record, this list is a bit ridiculous at parts, and my participation in the comment-and-question does not constitue an endorsement of the the author or the author’s views.

  36. sarah wrote:

    This is a terrific post.

    I’m sure someone will jump on me for this, but I wish I could broadcast 4 from the top of some very, very, extremely tall building. When I’m talking about race, I’m talking about GROUP dynamics. Your story of INDIVIDUAL tragedy is just that, tragedy. What it is not, is representrative of GROUP politics. It is would be just as irrelevant for me to say, in reaction your cancer diagnosis, that women of color are oppressed in America. For some reason, you want to compare your individual tragedy to my group tragedy. Forget it! The very attempt to compare is defensive. When I talk about racial oppresion, I am not trying to OFFEND you. So please don’t try to DEFEND yourself.

    Thanks again.

    Can I just say that I find it so interesting that so many commenters think this list is common knowledge to white Americans. As a women of color on a college campus, I know quite a number of white people who have obviously never even thought that saying the N word, throwing a ghetto party, professing colorblindness (etc. etc.) might be objectionable in the least

  37. byootifulmynd wrote:

    The post was meant to be funny and it was. Let’s not get too serious.

  38. Sabrina wrote:

    Sorry, I’m a little late to this blog (therefore, this probably won’t get read) but, I see the humour in this article and I also agree that this is beneficial. I too grew up in a mostly white environment where a couple of hints were definitely needed. Don’t be mad…think of it the same as a handbook on etiquette or if I ask you to take your shoes off before entering my house.

    I liken this article to the movie, “Crash” which *I* wasn’t impressed with, because it didn’t tell *me* anything about race relations that I didn’t already know, however, it was probably beneficial for the part of the audience that is not “racist”, but unaware of “how subtle racism completely permeates our culture and everyday interactions within society”.

    I also think labels do a disservice to this entire conversation. In reading some of the posts I saw comments like, “I’m not a racist” or “Let’s call everyone homosapiens”. Let’s not, let’s deal with the issue at hand instead being auto-offended when “racial etiquette” is discussed (on both “sides”) or dismissive when various cultures express discontent with the social interactions they have with the white people.

  39. Mogs wrote:

    Freedom of speech gives people the RIGHT to say whatever they want, however it also gives others the right to react critically to what is said…

  40. Kruk Jane wrote:

    I’ve got to tell you, I agree with Margaret. I don’t think most young Caucasians really give a sh*t about this stuff anymore. For past couple generations, Caucasians have regarded the white/black color line as confusing and formidable, and might have tried nervously to abide by this sort of list. But I think most whites under 25 from cities were raised in more pluralistic environments, knew recent immigrants and others who seemed to have had life challenges unimaginable to most born-Americans, including African-Americans, and generally African-Americans seem to have receded a great deal in the consciousness of this generation of Americans. I think the reaction to this sort of list would likely be “get over yourself, no one’s going to waste their time obsessing about this kind of shit.”

  41. yeh wrote:

    kudos to the writer! of course people can say what they want, that’s not the point. the purpose of this article is to promote some understanding and if any white person is getting defensive then they obviously have a thing or two to learn. i think you’re very well written, and have articulated things i have tried to express to my white friends. i think i’ll pass the article on. thanks!

  42. jen* wrote:

    living in a place where i feel like passing this list out to everyone at work [though i could never actually .do. it, since they’d all get offended, because ‘they’re SO not racist’], i loved this. i’m grown enough to understand thi was no end-all, be-all, and it wasn’t the new Racial Miss Manners.

    meanwhile, my life would be much more comfortable if the white people around me would take a couple hints from the list.

    my current fave point: #7. why do white people care SO much about BET? i don’t even think black people care about it that much. and yet it comes up all the time - as though it’s some kind of excuse. anyway - are white people really feeling oppressed watching BET? seriously?

  43. Clay wrote:

    I won’t even bother beating a dead horse, so I’ll say this much.

    Try not to generalize about either side, “race”, ethnicity, or sex. Very little, if anything, in life is absolute. If you must take anything from this, realize (as some of you probably already do) that not everyone sees the world through your eyes. We all have different perspectives and we ought to be considerate of those around us because there are consequences.

  44. Nezua wrote:

    great post.

  45. Tarah Sweeney wrote:

    My pet peeve, as a South African, is having someone speak of “coloureds” and use the inverted commas in doing so!

    In South Africa, coloured is an actual race, yet there are many white people who refuse to acknowledge it.

    I know it’s deemed derogatory in the US, but over here, it is accepted; we’re as proud of the epithet as are other mixed-race people - that’s all it really denotes.

  46. clare wrote:

    Tarah - you do know that “epithet” literally means “insult” or “abusive word” or “abusive phrase”, right?

    Which means that an “epithet” is inherently derogatory.

    That’s all it really denotes. Or connotes, depending on who you’re talking to.

  47. Colin wrote:

    WET? That is what all TV is. Even the so called ‘black’ stations are very commercialized, usually by companies that have little or no understanding of the realities of this country. TV promotes the status quo - from fashion to news. In America, that IS white culture. Not that American culture is monotone, but the mainstream ’story’ is certainly racist.

  48. Dan wrote:

    I’ve been sifting through Racialicious for about 2 weeks now as I only recently discovered it. I just wanted to add something to the list. This is taken from a series I’ve been doing on my blog called ‘Things you shouldn’t do if you’re white.’ It’s a series intended to help whites know what NOT to do, and more importantly, WHY they shouldn’t do them.

    *****Don’t comment on how ‘articulate’ a non-white person is.

    You’ve heard it before. Hell, you probably have even said it. After interacting with a black person or any non-white person, the comment inevitably comes, ‘You are so articulate!’.

    White people seldom give thought to this comment but judging by how offensive persons of color regard this comment, it certainly demands further inspection.

    The obvious questions arise in response to the comment: ‘You are so articulate!’

    -As opposed to what?

    -For who? For a black man/woman?

    Let’s start by first accepting the fact that you will never hear a white person calling another white person articulate. It’s just not done. I’ve never heard it in my 33 years and I’ve never heard stories from other whites who have heard it in their experiences. So that fact is the foundation of the insult: white people don’t call other white people articulate because deep down, they don’t by and large consider white people in general as INarticulate. If you consider a whole race of people articulate, you’re not going to constantly single one person out just to tell them that they’re articulate, because you already think they are.

    So that given, the base feeling behind a white person commenting to a black person, ‘You’re so articulate!’ must mean that this black person has acted as an exception to the rule that all black people are inarticulate. It comes from a prejudice that black people are people who speak in ebonics, are hard to understand, and who do not properly speak the English language. Basically, before the black person has even opened their mouth, the white person already has an expectation that the black person is going to sound ‘ghetto’ and talk in urban slang and ebonics. So then when the black person sounds ‘normal’ and speaks perfect English, the white person is surprised and blurts out, ‘You’re so articulate!’ as if the rest of the black population ISN’T articulate. A reaction based on an irrational negative stereotype if ever there was one.

    So now you begin to see how blacks and other minorities regard this statement and just how completely insensitive, ignorant, and prejudiced a comment it really is.

    When we whites can regard blacks in the same way that we regard each other, progress will be made. You see, in regards to whites and speaking, we regard whites who don’t speak ‘normal’ as the exception to the rule. Cajuns, deep southerners, etc. are all very small subsets of the white population who speak a very difficult to understand form of English.

    We need to regard blacks in the same capacity: that the majority of them speak perfect English and that it is only small subsets of them that DON’T speak ‘normal’ English. Only when that happens will white people cease commenting to the few black people they actually come across as ‘articulate’.

    So please, my fellow whites, learn this lesson today and internalize it. Let it sink deep inside and begin to dissipate your stereotypes and prejudices. When you act surprised that someone has exceeded your low expectation of them, you have to question why you had such a low expectation of them in the first place, and question if that low expectation was unfounded and based on ignorant and prejudiced thoughts. When you can teach yourself to question these situations and deconstruct them with logic and rational thought, you will learn to apply that way of thought to OTHER situations and will begin the process of dismantling your own prejudices and ignorance that has been ingrained in you by a white dominated culture.

  49. Korolev wrote:

    While there is no human race, there is a human species. Mammals are a subset of the Animal Kingdom, one of the 6 main Kingdoms of life used by Biologists. Other Kingdoms include Bacteria, Archaea, Fungi, Protists and Plants.

    So, although the article is correct in pointing out that there is no human “race”, there is a human species, and certainly there isn’t a Mammalian species.

    Sorry for nitpicking.

  50. Nell wrote:

    Interesting post. I’m a white female, mid-thirties. Grew up in a repressive midwestern town, moved to California to escape at age 18.

    I distill your list down to a few basic points: Call people what they want to be called. I never understood why some folks have soooo much trouble with this - it’s not really that hard. It’s not a suffering competition. Try to be aware of your own predjudices - you do have them; numerous psychological studies have shown this. It’s something you have to think critically about and work on. Be respectful of others. And above all, the Golden Rule: treat others as you would have them treat you.

    In my workplace, I feel isolated because I’m a woman in an extremely male-dominated profession (experimental physics). I sometimes crave the company of other women. Because of this experience, I can empathize with the need to be around people who are like you. I’m not trying to rank my experience relative to a POC’s - the point is that my own isolation helps me sympathize with the frustration that people of color must feel in a white-dominated environment. That said, I think the roots of racism and sexism are similar: hatred and contempt for the “other”.

    I think a lot of the crap you hear about BET, etc. comes from people who are a) racist and b) resentful at what they perceive as being left out. There’s sort of a group psychology thing at work, I think - many people want to be part of groups, and they get resentful when they aren’t. Of course, a lot of these people are also unwilling to acknowledge that their whole worlds are basically clubs for white people.

    Oh well, I just hope that my non-white friends don’t think I’m a jerk.

  51. Dee wrote:

    #10 - I am sorry, although I think you have some educators in the Black/African American community to blame for this. I can’t even count the number of diversity lectures/seminars/classes/etc that I have been through in the past 20 years that really make a white person feel like a racist if they use the term Black instead of African American.
    Seriously, go to diversity training on any college campus USA and count the number of times they say black vs. African American. Also, listen to the way they use the term black vs. African American.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.